Page 10 - EW July 2022
P. 10

Editorial




             PALKHIVALA SHOULD BE ALIVE AT THIS HOUR                           homes of citizens is that as encroach-
                                                                               ers they had no right, title or interest in
                                                                               buildings constructed on government
                  he sights and sounds of bulldoz-  minorities persecuted by prejudiced   land. Yet it’s common knowledge that
                  ers  razing  homes  of  citizens   Central and state governments.   to extract bribes corrupt government
             Twho had allegedly encroached       In this connection, lawyers need to   officials issue fake licences and en-
             on government land, which played   revisit the extraordinary legal creativ-  courage illegal construction on public
             out on 210 million television screens   ity of the late Nani Palkhivala (1920-  property. Judicial notice should be
             across the country last month, have   2002) who on several occasions per-  taken of this.
             severely  damaged  India’s  image  as   suaded the Supreme Court to injunct   Moreover it’s surprising that latter
             nation of orderly governance and rule   runaway governments at the Centre   day leading lights of the bar have not
             of law. Outrage over dispensation of   from eroding the fundamental rights   pressed the courts to apply the doc-
             executive justice has provoked six for-  and freedoms of citizens and minori-  trine of estoppel to disqualify state
             mer Supreme and high court judges   ties. In the Golak Nath Case (1967),   and local governments from contest-
             and an equivalent number of veteran   although it was settled law that under   ing titles of structures built on gov-
             lawyers to petition the Chief Justice   Article 368, Parliament with a two-  ernment land years after occupation.
             and Supreme Court to take suo motu   thirds majority, could amend any   Government has a public duty to con-
             cognisance of the blatant disregard of   provision of the Constitution, he suc-  test adverse possession of government
             due process by the BJP government of   cessfully argued that it cannot alter or   property immediately after encroach-
             Uttar Pradesh.                   abridge fundamental rights encapsu-  ment. Not at its convenience, years
                Although the languid reaction   lated in Part III of the Constitution.   after.
             of the judiciary to the UP state gov-  Moreover in the Kesavananda Bhara-  With his brilliant logic, lateral
             ernment directly visiting draconian   ti Case (1973), he prevailed upon the   thinking and creative interpretation
             punishment  on  alleged  rioters  and   apex court to rule that altering the   of law, were he alive at this hour,
             anti-socials without due process is   basic structure of the Constitution is   Palkhivala would have persuaded the
             reprehensible, the fault is less of the   beyond the authority of the largest   Supreme Court to estopp official de-
             bench than bar. The country’s top legal   parliamentary majority.   molition of citizens’ homes when gov-
             practitioners have failed to creatively   In the present instance, the justi-  ernment neglects to contest adverse
             interpret the law to protect the rights   fication of the UP and several other   possession of public property within
             and property of citizens and religious   state governments for demolishing   reasonable time.

             AGNIPATH: INADEQUATE GROUND PREPARATION                           undergrad colleges offering obsolete
                                                                               curriculums and poor learning out-
                                                                               comes. Especially since at the end of
                  he violent protests that erupted   Rank One Pension) in 2014, the gov-  their four years service, unretained
                  last month countrywide against   ernment’s military pension bill has   soldiers will receive a Rs.11 lakh sev-
             Tthe Central government’s Ag-    risen from 19 percent in 2020-21 to 26   erance package which could bankroll
             nipath  armed  forces  short-term  re-  percent of the defence budget (Rs.5.2   small businesses and enterprises, es-
             cruitment scheme have further desta-  lakh crore in 2022-23). Against this,   pecially if collectively promoted.
             bilised the post-pandemic economic   in the US, pension payout aggregates   Moreover, Agniveers not retained
             recovery  process  already  slowed  by   10 percent of the defence budget and   will have the option of availing 10 per-
             communal violence, rising unemploy-  14 percent in China. Clearly, with   cent quotas in the Centre’s paramili-
             ment and inflation.              55,000  retirees  added  annually  to   tary force and defence public sector
               The Agnipath schema reduces the   the already extant 3.2 million defence   enterprises. In the circumstances, the
             tenure of new recruits into the de-  services  pensioners,  the  number  of   national interest demands that pro-
             fence services — army, navy and air   foot-soldiers being absorbed in the 1.1   testing youth should accept the new
             force — from 14 years with pension   million-strong Indian defence services   Agnipath scheme.
             and medical coverage, to four years   had to be reduced to curtail the pen-  However, peremptory introduction
             without these benefits. According to   sions bill to release resources for mod-  of the Agnipath recruitment initiative
             government spokespersons, the Ag-  ernisation of the three services in the   has again highlighted the proclivity of
             nipath scheme will reduce the aver-  new age of technology-driven warfare.   the BJP government at the Centre to
             age age of serving defence personnel   Nor is a four-year stint in the armed   introduce important legislation with-
             to 26 (from 32 years currently), slash   services as bad a deal as the nation’s   out adequate ground preparation. It’s
             the services annual pension payout   rampaging youth have been led to   pertinent to note that demonetisation,
             by Rs.34,500 crore annually, releas-  believe. Four years of training in the   the national pandemic lockdown and
             ing resources for induction of new age   highly disciplined defence services is   the necessary farm reform bills were
             technologies and equipment into the   a great opportunity to acquire hi-tech   sprung on citizens at short notice,
             defence services.                skills which will benefit 75 percent of   without adequate debate in Parlia-
                Undoubtedly, there is considerable   youth demobilised at the end of four   ment or public forums. Greater aware-
             substance in the new schema which   years. Arguably, this is a preferable   ness  of  the  grammar of democratic
             is fully backed by military top brass.   option to enroling for a three-year de-  politics could have saved the economy
             Since the introduction of OROP (One   gree programme in state government   and public great damage and grief.


             10    EDUCATIONWORLD   JULY 2022
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15