Page 316 - Binder2
P. 316

6.2 – Regulatory Limbo


               If edible biologics threaten the business model of Big
               Pharma, then regulatory uncertainty is their first
               battleground.


               The current drug approval system was built around a clear
               paradigm: drugs are chemically synthesized or grown in
               cells, purified, and administered through controlled routes
               like injection or infusion. Every element of the regulatory
               pathway—from preclinical validation to cGMP standards to
               clinical trial design—is calibrated around that central
               dogma.


               Edible biologics defy that model.

               They introduce proteins orally, within unpurified plant
               tissue. They blur the lines between food and
               pharmaceutical, between biologic and supplement. And that
               creates a kind of regulatory purgatory—where no one
               knows exactly how to classify them, and therefore no one
               knows exactly how to approve them.

               Drug, Food, or Something Else?

               Is an encapsulated lettuce leaf expressing a therapeutic
               protein a drug? A food? A biologic? An advanced
               therapeutic medicinal product? The answer is yes—and no.
               And that’s the problem.

               In the U.S., the FDA classifies biologics under the Public
               Health Service Act, subject to rigorous CBER oversight.
               But if a protein is expressed in a plant and not purified—if
               it’s delivered in edible form—then it doesn’t fit neatly into
               any existing category. It doesn’t behave like a traditional



                                          314
   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321