Page 326 - Binder2
P. 326

another—at least in molecular terms. The differentiator
               becomes price, accessibility, and delivery context.

               This levels the playing field—but it also flattens the value
               of exclusivity.




               In short, edible biologics don’t break intellectual
               property law. They bend around it.

               They reveal that much of pharma’s value proposition is not
               in the molecule itself—but in the legal frameworks that
               protect it.

               And when those frameworks no longer apply, companies
               are forced to compete on something far more
               uncomfortable:

               The actual value they deliver to patients.




               6.4 – Patenting the “How” not the “What”


               In pharma, exclusivity is everything. Not just because it
               protects the science—but because it protects the margins.


               If anyone can replicate what you’re doing—if they can
               express the same protein, deliver it the same way,
               manufacture it at the same quality—you don’t make any
               money. Period. The price floor crashes, the product
               becomes commoditized, and the incentive to innovate
               vanishes. The entire model of modern drug development—
               billions in R&D, years of trials, global distribution—
               depends on one core reality:

                                          324
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331