Page 333 - Binder2
P. 333

The same facility footprint can be expanded modularly.
               There’s no need to wait three years for a new bioreactor to
               be built or revalidated. There’s no cold-chain bottleneck.
               There’s no sterile injection bottleneck. There’s just
               biomass—and it scales beautifully.


               This isn’t just a cost savings. It’s a structural inversion.

               In the old model, scale demands capital.
               In the new model, scale demands sunlight and square
               footage.


               The cost curves don’t just bend—they flatten. They open
               up new geographies, new patient populations, and entirely
               new possibilities for access.


               And in doing so, they don’t just disrupt manufacturing.

               They decentralize power.




               One of the most overlooked advantages of edible biologics
               is that they don’t require a centralized industrial
               complex to produce. Traditional biopharmaceutical
               manufacturing demands multimillion-dollar facilities,
               highly trained personnel, specialized cleanrooms, and
               complex cold-chain logistics. As a result, biologic
               production has become geographically concentrated—often
               limited to a few nations with the capital, regulatory
               infrastructure, and technological capability to support it.


               But edible biologics flip that model on its head.
               They offer a future where drugs can be made near the
               point of care, not thousands of miles away.



                                          331
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338