Page 73 - Binder2
P. 73

Instead of addressing the underlying immunologic drivers
               of therapy resistance—such as antigen escape, T cell
               exhaustion, or antibody neutralization—J&J built a
               stepwise treatment model where each new therapy slots in
               as the previous one fails. From daratumumab to
               talquetamab, the goal isn’t to keep patients on one durable
               drug. It’s to own every rung of the ladder.


               And the ladder is long. Most patients with myeloma will
               cycle through 3–5 different biologics in their lifetime.
               That’s not a bug. That’s the business model. Each loss of
               response becomes an opportunity—for the next branded
               infusion, the next bispecific rescue, the next CAR-T reset.

               To be clear: these drugs save lives. They extend survival.
               They buy time.
               But they don’t fix the problem at the root.

               Tolerization, immune escape, and biologic attrition are
               accepted as inevitable—not because they have to be, but
               because the system has never demanded otherwise. In fact,
               it’s structured to benefit from patient turnover. When a
               drug stops working, it doesn’t end the relationship—it just
               hands the baton to the next revenue stream.

               In multiple myeloma, Johnson & Johnson isn’t just treating
               a disease.
               They’ve built a business on managing failure—carefully,
               sequentially, and profitably











                                           71
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78