Page 26 - วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชํานัญพิเศษ
P. 26

วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชำานัญพิเศษ



            the first sale of a good, or a batch of goods, only if the sale has occurred in one of the
            member countries of a regional organization that follows this principle as a common

            rule for all members. Under this system, the imports of products originating from third
            countries remain unlawful and can be stopped as infringement. To date, regional

            exhaustion is the common policy adopted by EU Member States, reflecting the need to
            balancing free movement of goods with IP protection and regional trade interests.
                                                                                           28
                    Hence, even though countries remain free to select their preferred approach
            regarding their domestic exhaustion policy, the only way to secure free movement of

            goods in a free trade area or regional organization is by limiting, amongst other trade-
            related barriers, the enforcement of national IP rights towards genuine goods.  To the
                                                                                       29
            contrary, in the absence of a common policy such a regional exhaustion, or in the absence

            of parallel domestic position favoring international exhaustion (by agreement or
            coincidence), goods cannot freely move across the regional territory, unless when these
            movements are authorized by the intellectual property owners.

                    Still, not adopting a common policy on the issue is not unique to ASEAN
            Members. With the exception of the EU, no international agreement indicates what

            domestic position individual countries should adopt in this respect. Moreover, TRIPS
            does not address the issue of IP exhaustion in the context of the harmonization of IP

            rights, as overtly emphasized in Article 6 of TRIPS.  As a result, without explicit
                                                                 30
            direction to find a common policy, countries remain free to select their respective rules
            on IP exhaustion based on a variety of national interests, including the size of their

            markets and the level of development. In particular, countries tend to adopt the national
            policy that best promotes national interests by balancing the interests of (a) IP owners

            who desire control of cross-border trade of their products and the ability to set prices;
            (b) third party importers importing/exporting the goods that they lawfully purchased
            (generally in lower cost markets to be exported in higher cost markets); and (c)

            governments favoring either the protection of national markets and allowing price



                    28  Id.
                    29  Id.
                    30  TRIPS, supra note 19, art. 6.



            24
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31