Page 57 - ดุลพาห เล่ม3.indd
P. 57

ดุลพาห




             Introduction: A Historical Account of Public Participation in Thailand


                     Thailand had gone through a democratic transition and socio-economic
            development path similar to many neighboring Asian nations. As the country became
                                                                     1
            more prosperous, an increasing number of citizens up and down the land who had just
            emerged from subsistence poverty began to demand for a formal recognition of their

            fundamental rights and proper involvement in the political process. At the dawn of
            democracy in the 1930s, the first version of the Constitution (1932) laid down the

            fundamental principles of democracy and the mechanism for safeguarding the rule of
            law. For the first time, the Constitution recognized that the ultimate sovereignty

            resides with the people of Thailand. A bicameral parliament represented the will
            and aspiration of the populace and provided a counterweight keeping the executive

            branch in check. In addition, the monarchical powers were bound by the constitutional
            framework. Nevertheless, during this embryonic state of democracy, the country’s

            administration was still controlled by a privileged few consisting of members of the
            royal family, aristocrats, and foreign educated public officials until the

            democratization progress took shape in the mid-1970s.   Rapid industrialization and
                                                                2
            the resulting sustained period of economic growth in the ensuing decades had an

            effect, among others, of bridging the gap both socio-economically and politically
            between the Bangkok-centered bureaucratic state and the urbanized regional centers.
                                                                                           3
            The new destabilizing dynamics culminated in a series of economic and political
            events, particularly the so-called Black May political uprising in 1992 and the Asian

            Financial Crisis in 1997, that profoundly influenced the way in which the role of the




            1. Aurel Croissant, “From  Transition to Defective Democracy:  Mapping Asian Democratization”
              Democratization, Vol.11, No.5 December 2004, at 156-178. Somboon Siriprachai, Chapter on Thailand,
                 in Anis Chowdhury and Iyanatul Islam (eds.), Handbook of Asian Economies – Southeast Asia and
                 Northeast Asian, Edward Elgar, 2007.
            2.  Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, Thailand: Economy and Politics, Oxford University Press, 2002.
            3.  Phongpaichit and Baker (2002), at 258.




            46                                                               เล่มที่ ๓ ปีที่ ๖๕
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62