Page 20 - A Narrative of the History of Roanoke Virginia
P. 20

The constant stream of ridicule and portrayal of Roanoke as a company town
                  or western boom town tempered the wildly exaggerated reports of a New South
                  emerging there and created anxiety among locals. When the town’s subsequent
                  growth did not measure up to boosters’ predictions, many residents interpreted it as a
                  sign that the boom had gone bust. As a result, widespread gossip surfaced about the
                  looming collapse of land values, the railroad relocating, or the Improvement
                  Company and Machine Works going bankrupt. “The air is rife with rumors of
                  impending destruction,” S. S. Brooke explained, “and every occurrence, connected
                  even with the progress of events here, is distorted, magnified and greedily sent out.”
                  The town was doing well, he argued, so “the cranks had as well cease their croaking.”


                  Reporters’ repeated focus on the similarities between Roanoke and “mushroom
                  cities” of the West were far from an exaggeration. Most “instant cities” in Colorado or
                  California lacked the small base of natives that were present in Roanoke but
                  experienced the same period of intensive demographic growth coupled with
                  haphazard structural development. Moreover, they also had the same abundance of
                  cheaply built, frame vernacular structures, similar wooden sidewalks aligning mud or
                  dirt streets, lack of systematic sanitation, and numerous businesses houses using
                  false-fronts to camouflage their meager size or crude construction. Since a gold or
                  silver vein could dry up at any moment, their residents, like Roanoke’s inhabitants,
                  were less likely to gamble on expensive brick buildings. They were also not overly
                  concerned about municipal services because their long-term residency was
                  questionable. In this “camp phase” of development, land companies, saloons,
                  gambling houses and brothels usually outnumbered dry-goods stores, churches,
                  restaurants, or schools, and most inhabitants adopted a get rich quick mentality along
                  with a somewhat disorderly “frontier atmosphere.”

                  Although Roanoke was also often mistaken for a company town, the city was clearly
                  not entirely developed, owned, or managed by the Clark firm. Natives owned the area
                  around what had been Big Lick Depot as well as much of the western city, and the
                  municipality had an independent government structure as well as numerous
                  industries and businesses not connected to Clark & Company.


                  The resemblance to a company town, nevertheless, was striking. The RL&IC
                  controlled almost all of eastern Roanoke, where most workers lived in
                  company-owned cottages, and its paternalism was responsible for Woodland Park,
                  the local Catholic Church, a “public” schoolhouse, and numerous beautification
                  crusades in the Northeast.


                  It owned the city’s water supply, developed nearly all of the property that was
                  emerging as the central downtown district, and dominated holdings in local property
                  and housing. The Roanoke Machine Works, the SVRR, and the N&W were by far the
                  municipality’s largest employers, and the Clark firm was also a silent partner in
                  several other local enterprises. Moreover, Clark & Company architecture – the Hotel
                  Roanoke, the SVRR Offices, the Union Depot, the massive shops, yards, and
                  roundhouses entirely dominated the local landscape. None of this, however, made
                  Roanoke a company town. Instead, the city most closely resembled what one scholar
                  has categorized as a “corporate town”; places where multiple enterprises and an
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25