Page 36 - Gi flipbook - November 2018
P. 36

IGEM NEWS | Young Persons Paper Competition 2018

                 SEVERE THIRD PARTY



                 DAMAGE TO A 30IN HIGH



                 PRESSURE PIPELINE




                 How changes in threats to pipeline integrity can

                 lead to an existing feature being viewed differently



                 By Chris Rodgerson, Integrity Engineer, Northern Gas Networks


                           he gas networks are
                           critical infrastructure,   FIGURE 1: The Enterprise Products LLC pipeline rupture in the United States, which
                           providing the vast     resulted in a fatality
                           majority of the energy
                           used in the United
                 T Kingdom. Northern Gas
                 Networks (NGN) offtake gas from the
                 national transmission system through
                 a high pressure pipeline network
                 before the gas is regulated to the
                 appropriate pressure for delivery to
                 customers in the North of England.
                   NGN’s promise to ensure the
                 continued safe operation of the high
                 pressure pipeline network is robust, as
                 demonstrated by its operating record.
                 The consequences of a rupture on a
                 high pressure pipeline can be
                 catastrophic – from an ignited release
                 of gas resulting in an explosion and its
                 immediate devastation, through to the
                 loss of supply which could impact   restoring the pressure-containing   Figure 3 shows the damage when
                 vulnerable customers and major   capability of the pipeline. This is the   compared with a 20 pence coin.
                 industry. An example of such a rupture  most severe categorised feature found
                 can be found in the United States   on a high pressure pipeline in NGN’s   Note the following details:
                 where, in 2010, an Enterprise Products  operating history.        •  There is no visible associated
                 LLC pipeline  was struck by an auger   I investigated the event including   denting
                           1
                 truck resulting in the death of the   why the feature classification was   •  The spalling is in a circular pattern
                 auger operator (see Figure 1).   changed, when and how the feature   •  Material has been smeared around
                   The inspection report from the   had been introduced, and what could   with repetitive ‘chatter’ marks
                 scheduled 2015 in-line inspection (ILI)   be learnt from this event which may   •  The damage has a distinct step, with
                 of an NGN pipeline with a maximum   benefit the wider industry and reduce   an outer ring and deeper inner circle
                 operating pressure of 38bar classified   the probability of another occurrence.  •  The inner circle is relatively flat-
                 a single feature as ‘unknown’. This                                bottomed
                 feature was previously classified as an   DAMAGE OBSERVATIONS     •  The spalling pattern around the
                 external manufacturing feature. With   A desktop study and site visit showed   main feature is similar to that of the
                 the change in classification and the   no obvious cause of the ‘unknown’   secondary feature (see Figure 4)
                 feature being oriented at 12 o’clock   feature, so to investigate further an   A coring bit (to recover core
                 with a circular profile, NGN decided to   excavation was planned in 2016 with   samples) would generally give a
                 further investigate. Once excavated   the appropriate precautions   rugged, flattish profile to the bottom
                 and grit blasted, the remaining wall   implemented to manage the risk to   of a hole made in rock, very similar to
                 thickness was measured as 1.6mm   personnel and the pipeline. Figure 2   the profile of the main feature. A
                 (from a nominal wall thickness of   shows what was found upon     mechanised drilling bit boring the
                 12.7mm). The P/11 defect assessment    excavation – a four inch diameter hole   pipeline would generate heat,
                                              2
                 judged the feature as severe. It was   penetrating a reinforced concrete slab   resulting in work hardening of the
                 repaired using an epoxy sleeve, fully   directly above the ‘unknown’ feature.  low-carbon pipeline steel. This



                  36


        IGEMNews_YPPC.indd   1                                                                                    18/10/2018   13:38
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41