Page 19 - Biblical Counseling II
P. 19

“In September 1848, (in the state of Vermont
                                                                        in the United States) Phineas P. Gage, a
                                                                        twenty-five-year-old railroad foreman, was
                                                                        using explosives to clear the way for a new
                                                                        track. In preparation for blasting, he was
                                                                        packing an explosive charge into a drill hole
                                                                        with a thirteen-pound, three-and-a-half-foot-
                                                                        long tamping rod. An accidental spark ignited
                                                                        the charge prematurely, sending the rod
                                                                        through his left cheek and out the vault of his
                                                                        skull. It landed more than thirty yards away.
                                                                        Gage survived the experience but faced
               several weeks of infection, fever, and semi-consciousness. His condition became so poor that a coffin was
               prepared for him. But in the fifth week, his condition improved. Gage regained consciousness but was blind
               in the left eye. What made this case noteworthy was not Gage’s survival; however, it was the change in
               Gage’s behavior due to the brain damage that occurred. (photo from doctorsimpossible.com)

               Before the incident, Gage was well-liked by friends and was considered to be honest, trustworthy,
               hardworking, and dependable. When that tamping rod plowed through Gage’s skull, it took a part of his brain
               tissue with it and, in the process, something of Gage’s former self. After the accident, Gage’s doctor
               described him as ‘fitful, irreverent, indulging at times in the grossest profanity (which was not previously his
               custom), manifesting but little deference for his fellows, impatient. . . A child in his intellectual capacity and
               manifestations. His mind was radically changed, so decidedly that his friends and acquaintances said he was
               ‘no longer Gage’” (p. 158-159).

               Think about people you know in your community or those you knew when you were a child. Do you
               remember people who had brain damage, maybe after an accident? Or elderly people who had diseases
               impacting their brains? “Brain damage changes people by changing their abilities and their personalities.
               There is an intimate connection between the health of our brains and the health of our personalities. We
               often take it for granted that personality is indelible and unchanging, but that is incorrect. Although
               personality is stable, it is affected by the state and health of those two handfuls of grayish matter called the
               brain. Neurochemical transmitters, synapse connections, dendrites, and axons are all terms that are now
               used to describe the growing understanding of the brain-mind-personality relationship” (p. 159).

               A second piece of evidence for the biological paradigm is the “inheritance of temperamental traits. There is
               clear and strong evidence that temperament traits are transmitted genetically. Studies of personality traits of
               adults and their children and studies of identical and fraternal
               twins raised together and raised apart consistently point to the significant role of biology, especially genetics,
               in forming our personality. In studies in Sweden and the United States, researchers have found that identical
               twins raised apart have more similar personality types than fraternal twins raised together. Even preferences
               in clothing style, personal interests, body posture, body language, speed and tempo of talking, sense of
               humor, and recreational habits were discovered to be more common among the identical twins studied. Such
               research lends support to the biological paradigm of human personality (p. 160).”

               The third piece of evidence for the biological paradigm is “the consistency of temperament over time. Some
               have linked temperament to genetics and then defined personality as temperament plus environment
               (nature + nurture). Generally speaking, when we go to bed at night, we do not expect to wake up the next
               day with a radically changed personality. Although abrupt changes do occur, these are often due to trauma of
               some sort, either physical or emotional, which changes brain physiology in the case of an accident or brain
               chemistry in the case of a traumatizing event. More often, humans experience a stable, consistent
               personality, which is predictable from day to day. Biological psychologists believe that this is because of the

                                                               17
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24