Page 3 - Book Review Interactional Orderliness and Disorderliness
P. 3

198        Southeast Asian Social Science Review Vol. 8, No. 1, 2023



            used by MPs would make anyone want to crawl out of the august
            house. David Yoong surmised from the period of his analysis that
            the Speaker (the Chair of the House) is seen to be lenient to IOD
            and given the official language is Bahasa Malaysia, there are oft
            pidginized exchanges and outbursts. The field of discourse analysis as
            applied in legal, judicial and political institutions is a lively emergent
            field (cf. Vijay K. Bhatia, Maurizio Gotti, Azirah Hashim, Philip
            Koh and Sundra Rajoo Eds; International Arbitration Discourse
            and Practices in Asia (Routledge) (2018) and Teun A. van Dijk,
            Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk
            (Cambridge) (2009). Vijay K Bhatai & Ors’ text published in a
            Conference proceedings held in 2017, examined how commercial
            dispute resolution and its contestations are resolved in an arbitral
            context. More apposite to this review is Teun A. van Djik’s work as
            he observed,’ ... that similar contextual conditions as in Samoa hold
            for the context setting of the British parliament, where a well-known
            distinction exists between frontbenchers and backbenchers, …, the
            Prime Minister speaks first , then the Head of the Opposition , and
            then the other MPs.” Teub A.van Djik surmised that what seems to
            be the cultural specifics of contexts of discourse in Non-Western
            Societies are not that different from the contexts in Western Societies.
            David Yoong’s work can be enlarged by other researchers in this
            field by examining how social and cultural contexts in the Malaysian
            Parliament notwithstanding being modelled as Westminster differs
            or are similar to British Parliament. Anchored within such discourse,
            it is unfortunate that David Yoong’s has not cited Teub A.van Djik’s
            work in his book.
                Rhetorical studies were part of classical learning and it has re-
            emerged as discourse analysis as a discipline worthy of interest not
            only in the academic world but vital in dealing with institutional
            issues within a deliberative democracy. More pertinently in wider
            philosophical ruminations, Continental thinkers like Paul Ricoeur
            and Jurgen Habermas demonstrated that language and analysis can
            yield emancipatory thought.
                David Yoong ‘s thesis does not negotiate such wider terrain
            and his analysis of IOD is contented to place Malaysian Parliament
   1   2   3   4