Page 26 - JICE Volume 7 Isssue 1 2018

Meng Yew Tee, Moses saMuel, norjoharuddeen bin Mohd nor, renuka a/p V saThasiVaM and huTkeMri
Table 1. Teachers’ Practices in Malaysia
Classification of teacher practice Classification of teacher

(in %)* practice (by median)
A B C D Level* % in C.I. at 95%
Median confidence
level
Instructional practices:
PA- Respect and Rapport 0 67 71 2 C 50.7 42.4 - 59.0
(0) (47.9) (50.7) (1.4)
PB- Culture of learning 0 6 118 16 C 84.3 78.3 - 90.3
(0) (4.3) (84.3) (11.4)
PC- Classroom procedures 0 114 25 1 B 81.4 75.0 - 87.9
(0) (81.4) (17.9) (0.7)
PD- Manage behaviour 0 120 19 1 B 85.7 79.9 - 91.5
(0) (85.7) (13.6) (0.7)
PE- Organize physical space 0 5 135 0 C 96.4 93.4 - 99.5
(0) (3.6) (96.4) (0)
PF- Communicating with 0 5 130 5 C 92.9 88.6 - 97.1
students (0) (3.6) (92.9) (3.6)
PG- Questioning 0 2 25 113 D 80.7 74.2 - 87.2
(0) (1.4) (17.9) (80.7)
PH- Engagement 0 1 68 71 D 50.7 42.4 - 59.0
(0) (0.7) (48.6) (50.7)
PI- Assessment for 0 2 33 105 D 75.0 67.8 - 82.2
instruction (0) (1.4) (23.6) (75)
PJ- Demonstrating 0 2 126 12 C 90.0 85.0 - 95.0
responsiveness (0) (1.4) (90) (8.6)
Curriculum implementation practices:
CC- Intra relationship 0 0 0 100 D 100 -
(0) (0) (0) (100)
CD- Inter relationship 0 0 0 100 D 100 -
(0) (0) (0) (100)
CE- Real world connection 0 0 8 132 D 94.3 90.4 - 98.1
(0) (0) (5.7) (94.3)
Assessment-for-learning practices:
AA- Share learning target 0 0 24 116 D 82.9 76.6 - 89.1
(0) (0) (17.1) 8(2.9)
AB- Recognize success 0 2 74 64 C 52.9 44.6 - 61.1
criteria (0) (1.4) (52.9) (45.7)
AC- Assessing students 0 1 36 103 D 73.6 66.3 - 80.9
thinking (0) (0.7) (25.7) (73.6)
AD- Descriptive feedback 0 6 55 79 D 56.4 48.2 - 64.6
(0) (4.3) (39.3) (56.4)
AE- Self and peer 0 1 9 130 D 92.9 88.6 - 97.1
assessment (0) (0.7) (6.4) (92.9)
AF- Flexibility to assessment 0 2 27 111 D 79.3 72.6 - 86.0
(0) (1.4) (19.3) (79.3)

*Note: A = Distinguished; B = Proficient; C = Basic; D = Unsatisfactory

22 Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2018, Volume 7, Issue 1