Page 35 - JICE Volume 7 Isssue 1 2018

Classroom PraCtiCe and the Quality of teaChing: Where a nation is going?
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development
of Children, 2, pp. 37-43.
Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum
materials. In J. Remillard, G. Lloyd and B. Herbel-Eisenmann (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers at
Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, pp.
17-36.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), pp. 3-13.
Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice?.
Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), pp. 109-125.
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danielson, C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument (2011 edition). Princeton,
NJ: The Danielson Group.
Danielson, C. (2013). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument (2013 edition). Princeton,
NJ: The Danielson Group.
Erickson, F. (2011). Uses of video in social research: a brief history. International Journal of Social
Research Methodology, 14(3), pp. 179-189.
Givvin, K.B., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J.K., Hollingsworth, H. and Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there national
patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Comparative Education
Review, 49 (3), pp. 311-343
Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., Hammerness, K., Wyckoff, J., Boyd, D., et al. (2010). Measure for
Measure: The Relationship Between Measures of Instructional Practice in Middle School English
Language Arts and Teachers’ Value-Added Scores. Washington, DC: CALDER.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., O’Brien, D. M. and Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The Market for Teacher Quality.
(Working Paper No. 11154). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hill, H.C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G.C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008). Mathematical
knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study.
Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), pp. 430-511.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational
Psychology Review, 16(3), pp. 235-266.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in
Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10/9707/2307-0919.1014.
Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K. and Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns
and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction,
19(1), pp. 66-78.
Janik, T. and Seidel, T. (2009). The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in
the Classroom. Münster: Waxmann Publishing.
Janik, T., Seidel, T. and Najvar, P. (2009). Introduction: On the power of video studies in investigating
teaching and learning. In T. Janik and T. Seidel (Eds.), The Power of Video Studies in Investigating
Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Münster: Waxmann Publishing, pp. 7-19.
Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T. and Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have We Identified Effective Teachers?
Validating Measures of Effective Teaching Using Random Assignment. Research Paper. MET
Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Kane, T. J. and Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality
Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Research Paper. MET Project. Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation.
Kennedy, J. and Mansor, N. (2000). Malaysian culture and the leadership of organizations: A GLOBE
study. Malaysian Management Review, 35(2), pp. 44-53.
Klette, K. (2009a). Blindness to change within processes of spectacular change? What do educational
researchers learn from classroom studies?. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan and D.

Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2018, Volume 7, Issue 1 31