Page 125 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 125

ments the surgeon was given and those he returned to the nurses, one   by the laws of Heaven, because he can only act according
 makes a thorough search for the missing instrument/swab/needle. If   to what his eyes see.
 there is still a discrepancy, one performs an x-ray of the abdomen in
 the operating room.  The Tashbetz seems to be differentiating between an unintentional act
 1. How is it possible for an instrument to be forgotten in the ab-  caused by negligence during treatment and an error in the diagnosis
 domen?    of the illness. The “expert physician” may have accidentally cut into a
 It is possible that the physician used the instrument to stop   healthy organ or into a blood vessel due to his own lack of attention.
 bleeding in the lower back, an area where visibility is poor since it is   If the patient dies as a result, he has to go into exile. He is essentially
 covered by the intestines. Without searching specifically in that area,   like the woodchopper whose ax handle flew off and killed someone,
 the instrument cannot be seen.  who has to be exiled. However, if a physician is treating patients using
 It is possible that the surgeon was trying to stop bleeding and left   laxatives, potions or medications, and he errs in the diagnosis and
 the instrument for a few moments. He then continued the surgery   the patient dies, he is exempt from exile. After all, he can only treat
 and forgot about the instrument.  according to what he sees and according to what logic dictates. Thus,
 The instrument fell out of the surgeon’s or nurse’s hands and into   if in spite of sufficient examination and study of the illness he erred
 the abdomen (not likely), and the surgeon did not notice it before   and made the wrong diagnosis, and therefore treated it wrongly, he is
 closing up the abdomen.  exempt even by the laws of Heaven.
 The surgeon put the instrument in the abdomen and forgot about
 it during surgery. Then he left the closure of the abdomen up to his   Sometimes, a young inexperienced physician is on duty. Although
 assistants, who had no idea that there was an instrument inside to be   he had the proper knowledge and had diagnosed the illness properly,
 removed.   he made a mistake due to lack of experience and not due to negli-
 In any event, if a proper count of instruments would have been   gence. It seems that in such a case, as well, he is exempt from exile
 made, the instrument would not have remained inside.  because it is not considered an unintentional act (shogeg) but an act
 2. Who is responsible for this oversight?  that he could not prevent (oness). This would apply if he did not have
 The nurse, who erred in the instrument count.  the opportunity at the time to consult with a senior physician, as we
 The head surgeon is responsible, at least for the fact that he did not   will explain below.
 carefully examine the surgical area.  According to this, there is a simple difference between the physi-
 The administration of the hospital is responsible for hiring the   cian and the ambulance driver who appear in our question. The phy-
 physician and nurses.  sician’s error was due to faulty reasoning. In such a case, if there was
 This is part of Dr. Dvir’s letter.  no negligence on his part, but he studied the case carefully and did not
 We received another letter from an expert pediatrician:  have the opportunity to consult with a senior physician, he is exempt
 To the honorable Rav… shlit”a  from exile because he is considered an anuss. On the other hand, the
 The patients’ lack of appreciation towards the physician, as ex-  ambulance driver killed a pedestrian due to his own carelessness, and
 pressed in legal suits for damages caused by medical negligence, raises   his act is considered unintentional (shogeg). It is no different from the
 questions regarding errors made by the physician during the course of   classic case of the woodchopper whose ax handle flew off and killed
 his continued employment.  someone, and he has to be exiled. He is like the surgeon whose knife




 94   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Do they require exile?  2   119                                                                        #                                                                                    20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 4 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:01 | SR:-- | Magenta   20818_efi-a







































































                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          # 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 4 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:01 | SR:-



  4
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130