Page 361 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 361

20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Magenta
                                                                     20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Cyan
                                                                     20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Black
                                                                      #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Yellow
 #
 12
           Berurah says (39:106) that some poskim rule that an apostate in one              #
           matter who sins for pleasure is not considered an apostate for the
           entire Torah. Lechatchilah, however, we should be stringent and not
           allow such a person to write Torah scrolls, tefillin and mezuzos. In
 TELLING A WOMAN THAT   She’arim Hametzuyanim Bahalachah (#10:1,5) the author cites the
 HER SPOUSE IS SUSPECTED   Birkas Yosef (Landau #1), who rules that the poskim differ regarding a
 OF SIN IN ORDER TO   robber: Some rule that if he is suspected of light transgressions, he is
 66 PREVENT ILLNESS OR   not suspected of more severe ones, meaning tefillin. However, Tiferes
 TRANSGRESSION   Yosef (Meisels #2) and other poskim disqualify him from being a sofer
           (scribe), until he repents.
              And it is probable that regarding our question, tefillin written by
           this patient are not disqualified, but the physician should try to con-
           vince him not to write Torah scrolls, tefillin and mezuzos. If the buyers
 1   Question  knew that the scribe is a sinner they would not have bought these
           items from him, so there is a possibility that this was a mistaken sale
 A 32-year-old man married to a Jewish woman, with 2 children, often   and that the sofer is guilty of theft. It would be good for the physician
 travels abroad. When he returned from his last trip, he asked to be   to convince the patient to stop working as a scribe, or that he com-  20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Magenta  #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:04 | SR:-- | Yellow  20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 12 -
 tested urgently for AIDS. He asked me not to tell his wife, because   pletely repent from his sins, because “Where those who repent stand,
 this might lead to their divorce.   the fully righteous cannot stand.”
 The testing did not uncover any antibodies against the AIDS vi-
 rus. As is known, however, it may take several months for antibodies   1   AnsweR to Question 2
 to appear after the exposure. Also, there is a strong suspicion that
 this man will continue his sinful ways and his chances of becoming   In maseches Bava Metzia (24a) it is related that a silver cup was once
 infected with AIDS are great.   stolen from Mar Zutra Chasida in a motel. When he saw a disciple
 Am I allowed to reveal this to his wife although I promised not to   wash his hands and dry them on someone else’s garment, he said:
 do so, and it is highly probable that the information will lead to the   “This is the person who stole the cup, as he has no consideration of
 breakup of the family?  the property of his fellowman.” He ordered the disciple to be forced
           to confess, until he confessed and showed him where the cup was.
 1   AnsweR   Rashi  (ibid.,  s.v.  agniv)  explains  that  the silver  cup  belonged  to
           the innkeeper and not to Mar Zutra. Why does Rashi say this? The
 It is forbidden for a person to reveal something told to him in secret.   Maharitz Chayus answers that if the cup had belonged to Mar Zutra
 As explained in maseches Yoma (4b): How do we know that if a per-  he would not have been able to rule for himself about a matter that is
 son says something to his fellow, he is not allowed to say anything   not clear. (See Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat #4). For this reason,
 unless he tells him “’Go, repeat this information”? As it says (Vayikra   Rashi explains that the cup belonged to the innkeeper. As a judge,
 1:1): ”And Hashem spoke to Moshe…saying, Speak to the children   since there were grounds for suspicion that he stole it, he forced him




 370   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  A mohel has syphilis  2   355
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366