Page 27 - DIFDUF
P. 27

697
                                                                                                    1.56 ± 1.14
                                                                                                            2
                                                                                                    30.3 ± 6.0
 The frequency of NOD2/CARD15 mutations is relatively
                                                                                                    8.74 ± 1.97
                                                                                                    72 (47.1%)
                                                                                                    81 (52.9%)
                                                                                                    67.5 ± 13.06
                                                                                                    n=153
 Interestingly, in our cohort only one of the three NOD2/
                                                                                                    Total
 As expected, and in accordance with previous findings, we
                                                                                                    1.56 ± 1.14
                                                                                                    30.3 ± 6.0
                                                                                                            2
                                                                                                    8.74 ± 1.97
                                                                                                    72 (47%)
                                                                                                    81 (53%)
                                                                                                    67.5 ± 13.06
                                                                                                    n=153
 0.23
                                                                                                    Total
 0.65
 0.32
 0.54
                                                                                                      prescribed.
 0.61
                                                                                                      been prescribed, and “no adherence” if no insulin had been
 0.54
                                                                                                      insulin, “partial adherence” if only one kind of insulin had
 0.43
                                                                                                      if the primary physician had prescribed basal and bolus
 0.63
                                                                                                      Adherence by physicians was defined as “full adherence”
 0.86
                                                                                                      pHySICIAn ADHEREnCE
 0.45
 0.61
                                                                                                      adherence” if the patient did not purchase any insulin.
                                                                                                      purchased only one kind of insulin (basal or bolus), and “no
 0.47
                                                                                                      (short-acting) insulin, “partial adherence” if the patient had
 0.08
                                                                                                      patient had purchased basal (long-acting) as well as bolus
 0.005
                                                                                                      Adherence by patients was defined as “full adherence” if the
 0.04
                                                                                                      pATIEnT ADHEREnCE
 0.07
 value
                                                                                                      Center.
 P
                                                                                                      by the research ethics committee at Assaf Harofeh Medical
                                                                                                      from 3–6 months before admission. Our study was approved
                                                                                                      each patient before admission was analyzed. The results were
                                                                                                      hospital electronic database. The last available HbA1c of
 The Gly908Arg mutation carriers were younger in age
                                                                                                      patient database, as this information is not available in the
                                                                                                      purchasing of insulin were retrieved from the Israeli national
                                                                                                      first month post-discharge data regarding prescription and
                                                                                                    Pre-hospitalization hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels and
                                                                                                      pitalization.
                                                                                                      were based on the clinical judgment of physicians during hos-
                                                                                                      hospital electronic database. The discharge recommendations
 REVIEWS  1 (5.9)   4 (24)  12 (71)  1 (5.9)  8 (47)  1 (5.9)  7 (41)   6 (5–15)  7 (41.2)  6 (37.5)  6 (35.3)  4 (23.5)  5 (33.3)  7 (41.2)  28.82 ± 9.1  38.88 ± 10.4  n=17 (68%)  Non-carrier   0.24  0.41  0.50  0.75  –  0.49  0.88  –  0.53  0.06  0.006  value   P    Original articles  9 (41.1)  9 (40.9)  4 (18.2)  2 (10.0)  0   5 (22.7)  1 (4.5)  0   11 (50.0)  30.7 ± 12.7  41.2 ± 12.3  n=22 (88%)  Non-carrier   2 (25)  2 (25)  4 (50)  1 (12.5)  4 (50)  1 (12.5)  2 (25)
 #
 Comparison of the Clinical utility in the Detection of   and need for prolonged respiratory assistance post-surgery, as   Table 3. Patients hospitalized for respiratory symptoms
 Anti-nuclear Antibodies Between the Elia CTD Screen   well as significant gastrointestinal symptoms, were similar in the   No
          groups.
                                                                                              recurrence  Recurrence
            Seven out of nine patients with recurrence of TEF and 32 of
 and Indirect Immunofluorescence on Hep-2 Cells:    65 patients with no recurrence were hospitalized with respira-  Number of hospitalizations  of TEF   of TEF   P
                                                                                                             value
                                                                                                      (n=7)
                                                                                              (n=32)
                                                                                              57
                                                                                                      34
 A Review of the literature   tory symptoms.              Number of hospitalizations per patient (median 25–75%)  1.5 (1–2)  3 (2–6)  0.011
            All the patients with recurrence of TEF who were hospital-
          ized had at least one episode of clinical bronchiolitis. There were   Number of patients with clinical bronchiolitis  19/32  7/7  0.073
 Christoph Robier MD 1,4   Omid Amouzadeh-Ghadikolai MD , Mariana Stettin MD  and Gerhard Reicht MD 2  24 episodes of bronchiolitis in our group of 9 patients. Among   Episodes of clinical bronchiolitis per patient (median 25–75%)  1 (1–2)  3 (2–6)  < 0.0001
 1
 3
          the patients with no recurrence who were hospitalized, 19 had   Episodes of positive PCR during clinical bronchiolitis
 3
 1 Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Departments of  Internal Medicine and  Psychiatry, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Graz, Austria    at least one episode of clinical bronchiolitis, and there were 30   15/30  9/24  0.42
 2
 4 Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Austria  Number of positive PCR per patient (median 25–75%)  0 (0–1)  1 (1–2)  0.009
          episodes of bronchiolitis.                      PCR = polymerase chain reaction, TEF = tracheoesophageal fistula
 131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 4 - B | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Magenta
            The details of patients who were hospitalized for respiratory
 131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 4 - B | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Yellow
 #131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 4 - B | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Black
          symptoms are presented in Table 3. The patients who had recur-  monary manifestations following TEF repair is multifaceted.
 131118-COHANIM - 131118-COHANIM | 4 - B | 18-11-13 | 11:24:13 | SR:-- | Cyan
          rent TEF had significantly more hospitalizations for respiratory   Tracheomalacia occurs in varying degrees of severity, rarely
 clinical suspicion is strong and the alternative method is nega-  symptoms (P = 0.011) and significantly more episodes of clini-  requiring aortopexy [15]. Recurrent respiratory infections are
 KEY WORDS:  antinuclear antibodies (ANA), Elia CTD Screen (ECS),    tive, it is mandatory to perform IIF [1]. Because both IIF and   cal bronchiolitis per patient (P < 0.0001) than patients without   common and persist into adulthood. History reveals persis-
 solid-phase assay  solid-phase assays have positive properties, in addition to weak   recurrent TEF.  tent cough, shortness of breath, and recurrent pneumonia [9].
      IMAJ 2018; 20: 700–702  points, a combination of the two techniques may improve the   During the hospitalizations for clinical bronchiolitis, six   Wheezing and physician-diagnosed asthma are reported in a
 screening procedure for ANA.  patients with and 11 patients without recurrent TEF had a   higher incidence than in the general population [3]. Airway
 In this review, we discuss studies that have evaluated the Elia   positive PCR for at least one respiratory virus. The routine   hyper-responsiveness can affect up to 78% of patients [7].
 CTD Screen (ECS) assay (Phadia, Thermo Fisher Scientific,   PCR panel includes parainfluenza, influenza types A and B,   Pulmonary function tests demonstrate restrictive patterns in
 he detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is important   Freiburg, Germany) to determine the optimal role of this test   respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus   a significant proportion of patients. Multiple potential predis-
 T in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disorders such as   in the diagnostic process.   (HMPV), and adenovirus. Adenovirus was the most frequent   posing factors include congenital or acquired vertebral or chest
 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc),   virus, which was identified in six patients with and three   wall abnormalities (i.e., scoliosis or postoperative rib fusions),
 Sjögren’s syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD),   ECS ASSAy   patients without recurrent TEF (data not shown).  surgical trauma, aspiration, and/or recurrent chest infections.
 and polymyositis. ANA are thus incorporated in several clas-  The ECS is a solid-phase fluoroenzymeimmunoassay. Each well   The patients with recurrence of TEF had significantly more   Obstructive or mixed patterns also have been described. At lung
 sification criteria [1,2]. Beyond that, there is an open discus-  of the ECS is coated with the following 17 antigens: dsDNA, SSA/  episodes of positive PCR for viruses (P = 0.009).  imaging, a few studies detected bronchiectasis and irregular
 sion whether ANA represent useful biomarkers in preventive   Ro 52, SSA/Ro 60, SSB/La, U1-RNP (RNP70, A, C), Sm, CENP-B,   cross-sectional shape of the trachea, whereas diffuse bronchial
 medicine [3], especially for the identification of pre- or early   Jo-1, Scl-70, Rib-P, fibrillarin, RNA polymerase III, PM-Scl, PCNA,   thickening, consolidations, and pleural abnormalities were the
 disease with an “intent to prevent”   Immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells and   and Mi-2. All of the antigens that are   DISCUSSION  main chest X-ray findings [7].
 approach [2,4].   included, except for dsDNA which   In this retrospective study, we assessed the factors associated   Recurrence of TEF manifests with respiratory and gastrointes-
 Indirect immunofluorescence   Elia connective tissue disease screening   is a native purified antigen, are   with recurrence of TEF. We found that recurrence of TEF was   tinal complaints, often mimicking the aforementioned symptoms.
 (IIF) on Hep-2 cells is regarded as   assay differ significantly in the   human recombinant proteins. The   associated with more hospitalizations for respiratory infections,   As mentioned earlier, persistent symptoms following repair can
 the gold standard for ANA screen-  sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear   cut-off levels for all antibody results,   more hospitalizations for bronchiolitis, and a greater rate of   be severe, and a high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose
 ing and has been defined as the   antibodies-associated disorders  with the exception of U1RNP, are:   positive PCRs for viruses. To the best of our knowledge, such   the recurrence. Early detection of recurrent TEF is required to
 reference screening method for ANA in the clinical laboratory   negative < 7 U/ml, equivocal 7–10 U/ml, and positive > 10 U/ml.   an association has not been reported.  prevent life-threatening events, decrements in pulmonary func-
 routine [1]. However, it has been shown that some subtypes of   Cut-off for U1RNP antibody results are: negative < 5 U/ml, equivo-  TEF is a congenital malformation that requires early inter-  tion, and serious long-term complications. Recurrence of fistula
 ANA, especially anti-SSA/Ro and anti-Jo-1 antibodies, may be   cal 5–10 U/ml, equivocal, and positive > 10 U/ml [8].   vention for surgical correction. Over time, the prognosis has   is not always easy to diagnose and establish. Barium swallow and
 overlooked by IIF [5]. Furthermore, IIF requires experienced and   improved significantly, with survival rates of over 90% due   various techniques, such as a dye study, during bronchoscopy are
 well-trained analysts, is quite time-consuming, and shows high   COnCORDAnCE Of THE ECS wITH IIf  to improved surgical techniques [9]. However, there is a high   required [16]. In a recent retrospective study of 65 patients with
 inter-observer variability [6]. To overcome these disadvantages,   In some published studies, the concordance between the ECS   burden of residual esophageal and pulmonary pathology in   recurrent TEF, 77% of TEF was categorized as recurrent, 26% as
 commercially available automated solid-phase assays incorporat-  and IIF has been determined. The concordance is calculated by   patients with TEF, which require medical and surgical inter-  acquired from esophageal leaks, and 6% as persistent or missed.
 ing a mixture of various extracted antigens have been developed.   the sum of all ECS positive /IIF positive  and ECS negative /IIF negative  study   ventions. Continual multi-disciplinary surveillance of clinical   Seven patients in this series had multiple TEFs [17].
 For laboratories with a high throughput of samples, such auto-  subjects. The available studies showed similar results, report-  symptoms and treatment response is warranted.  The recurrence is usually located in the pouch of the origi-
 mated tests may be beneficial. The diagnostic potential of auto-  ing concordance rates of 78.8% [9], 79.2% [10], and 83.1% [8],   Dysfunctional esophageal activity accounts for the gastro-  nal TEF [3] and usually requires additional corrective surgery,
 mated assays is restricted to the antigens incorporated in the panel   respectively.   intestinal symptoms described in the majority of children, with   although a few alternative methods, such as injections of fibrin
 of the test, which is a clear limitation for the use of solid-phase   DIffEREnCES In THE DETECTIOn Of AnA BETwEEn THE ECS AnD IIf  50–90% of adolescents and adults reporting some degree of dys-  glue [18] and bio-absorbable patches [19], have been developed
          phagia. While the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease
                                                          over the past few years. The rate of recurrent TEF in our study
 assays. Furthermore, it has been reported that some clinically rel-
 PERFECTOR  evant ANA included in the panel of these tests may be missed [7].  IIF and automated solid-phase assays have totally different test   decreases with age, it is still described in 18–63% in adults [9].  was 12%, which is consistent with previous reports.
            Prolonged respiratory symptoms are described both in
                                                            This study is the first to evaluate the possible association
 characteristics. IIF enables the analyst to detect a broad spec-
 The use of assays other than IIF is in accordance with inter-
 national recommendations. However, considering that if the
                                                          between recurrence of TEF and viral bronchiolitis. As noted
          children and adults following TEF repair. The etiology of pul-
 trum of antibodies at one view, whereas automated immunoas-
 700                                                                                                            689
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32