Page 204 - 20818_park-c_efi

20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 7 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Cyan
20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 7 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Black
#20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 7 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Yellow
20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 7 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Magenta
#
pected of taking a bribe, he is not obligated to do so, as long as
there is no danger to life involved. However, if there is concern
about pikuach nefesh, then “there is no wisdom or discernment
against the Lord.” Since there is nothing that stands in the way
of pikuach nefesh, the physician would be obligated to do what
must be done, despite the cost.

At Times Salvation Comes Not from the Very
Best
The great tzaddik Rav N. Tfilinsky zt”l studied in Yeshivas Etz Chaim
in Yerushalayim. He had a daughter who had come of age, and not a
penny to marry her off. He decided to ask the gabba’im of the yeshivah
for the contact information to one of their greatest patrons, so that
he could ask for his assistance. The gabba’im had difficulty deciding
whether or not to fulfill his request, since doing so would possibly
interfere with the Yeshivah’s income from the patron. Since they did
not want him to leave empty handed, they gave him the address of
one of their smaller contributors. Amazingly enough, this donor, who
was not a very rich man, sent Rav Tfilinsky all the expenses for the
wedding, as well as a dowry.
When asked what motivated his generous contribution, the donor
answered that his own daughter, a bride, was dangerously ill. He had
vowed to give the full sum of his own daughter’s dowry to any poor
bride who would seek his help. Since Rav Tfilinsky had approached
him first, he gave Rav Tfilinsky’s daughter all he had vowed to give.
We learn from this story that not always does salvation come from
the very best.
190 1 Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein
him and his work conditions will suffer as a result? Is he obligated, 7
even then, to reveal the truth?
One can answer that if the treatment in this Hospital A is good,
there is no obligation to reveal that things are even better in the other
Hospital B. All the halachos of saving lives are based on the mitzvah
“And you shall return a lost object,” in this case, one’s lost health (San-
hedrin 73a). The halacha is that one is not obligated to return a lost
object in a case where he would not do so even for himself, because of
the costs (See Baba Metziah 32b). It is likely that he would not do this
even for himself, since the other physicians and the administration
would be angry at him.
All this applies if the treatment in Hospital B is better. But if the
treatment in Hospital A is not adequate and reliable, and the patient
is likely to become endangered, the physician is obligated to hint to
the family members that they should go to Hospital B.
1 AnsweR to Question 4
Should the bronchoscopy be performed by a specialist, even though
this is likely to lengthen the patients’ wait, which the administration
of the hospital wants to avoid?
It seems to me that it is for the patient’s benefit that the test be
done by an expert. However, if doing so will seriously hold up other
patients, forcing the interns to do examinations, then one should tell
the patient that this examination is only accurate 70% of the time.
One is not, however, obligated to tell him that if an expert does the
procedure the rate of accuracy is 90%, if the lines will be longer as a
result. See above (Section 36).
1 AnsweR to Question 5
The Associate Director is obligated to express his opinion on the
correct solution to the problem. If the director accepts it, good, and if
not, then he has done his duty. If he is silent, he is violating the prohi-
bition of “Do not stand idly by the blood of your fellowman” (Vayikra
Division of Work in Hospital 2 199