Page 287 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 287

20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 9 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 9 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 9 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 9 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:46:24 | SR:-- | Magenta
 of pikuach nefesh. Therefore, there is place to rule stringently and rely   real danger but only the fear of it. Others, however, are prohibited to
 on one’s trust in Hashem.  desecrate Shabbos for him. The Tzofnas Pane’ach proves this from the
           words of the Rambam (Mishnah Commentary, Shabbos 2:5) regarding
 
           the Gemara that states that “If one extinguishes a lamp because he is
           afraid of robbers….”
              The Iggros Moshe (Orach Chaim, Vol. 1 #127) also writes: Some
 Surgery to Clarify whether a Fatal Bacterium is   people are fearful, and they consider this dangerous, and they are
 #
 Contagious  permitted to desecrate Shabbos since no one can guarantee that they
           are not in danger. This depends on the person’s individual mind.
 1   Question  Fearful situations are liable to cause mental illness, and we find that

 A kindergarten teacher in Israel got sick and died within a short time   mental illness is considered dangerous to life. As explained in Tractate
 period on  Shabbos. The physicians did not know which infection   Ta’anis (22b) and in the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim #288:9): If a
 had killed her and they suspected that it was a fatal and contagious   person is being pursued by an evil spirit, one cries out and prays for
 bacterium. Since this kindergarten teacher was in contact with many   him on Shabbos. The Mishnah Berurah explains (s.k.:27) that we do
 children until her last day, there was a possibility that she had infect-  this “lest he drown in the river or fall and die.” Likewise, it is permis-
 ed one or more of the children. In order to clarify the situation, it   sible to extinguish a lamp because of an evil spirit (as explained in
 was necessary to perform a postmortem surgery. The questions raised   Tractate Shabbos 29b).
 were: a) Is it permissible to perform an autopsy on the dead for this   The Magen Avraham (#554:8 and in Pri Megadim, ibid) says that
 reason? b) Is it permitted to desecrate Shabbos to travel to her house   a recovering shotah is fed on Yom Kippur, since fasting is liable to ag-
 to obtain the family’s permission to perform the autopsy?  gravate his illness and endanger him, and one must be concerned that
           the shoteh may kill himself or others.

 1   AnsweR   In Responsa Ramban (Attributed, #281 and cited in Beis Yosef, Yoreh
           De’ah #228) the following scenario is described: A person swore that
 It says in the Aruch Hashulchan (Orach Chaim #316:22): We kill a ra-  he would not laugh with tears of laughter. Subsequently, he became a
 bid dog, even on Shabbos. If there is a doubt whether or not it is really   shotah, recovered somewhat, but still regressed from time to time, and
 a rabid dog, is this like any other possibility of pikuach nefesh, which   laughter to the point of tears provided him with peace of mind. Is it
 suspends Shabbos, or not? Since even if we are sure that it is a rabid   permissible to release him from his vow? The Ramban responded that
 dog, it is still also only a possibility that it will bite someone, it follows   perhaps this scenario presents a possibility of pikuach nefesh. A shotah
 that if we are unsure if it is rabid altogether, perhaps it is forbidden to   is viewed as a person in danger and we permit prohibitions in order
 desecrate Shabbos in order to kill it? Although we desecrate Shabbos   to heal him. There are also poskim who rule that a shotah who was
 for even a mere possibility of pikuach nefesh (as written in #329 of   healed is obligated to recite the Hagomel blessing every time he comes
 Orach Chaim) this applies if the pikuach nefesh is obvious. If there is   back to his senses, (see Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, Vol. 12 #18) and that is
 doubt whether there is any pikuach nefesh altogether, perhaps it is not   because being a shotah is viewed as a dangerous illness.
 permitted to desecrate Shabbos. One must think about this. However,   In view of all this, if the physicians decide – based on the incidents
 one can and should tell a non-Jew to kill the dog.  that resulted in deaths – that nowadays there is a real possibility of




 244   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Shabbos Desecration to Prevent Anxiety  2   273
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292