Page 313 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 313

20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Magenta
 We do not circumcise a sick baby. Therefore, Shmuel specifies that   the eye, in spite of the fact that the physicians say there is no danger
 the implication of the Mishnah is that after he recovers from his ill-  to life.
 ness, one still has to wait seven days until he is rehabilitated and his   There is a big question we can raise about this topic. The Gemara
 strength returns to normal. The time of rehabilitation is seven days.   says that a baby should be washed in hot water before and after the
 There is something similar to this written in Responsa Divrei Malkiel   circumcision. If the water spilled after the circumcision, we desecrate
 (Vol. 2 #131:1).  Shabbos and heat up more water to wash him, because of the danger, as
 #
 Now we come to answer our question. Lachrymal gland infections   explained in Tractate Shabbos (134b). In practice, the Shulchan Aruch
 nowadays can be treated and cured, thanks to medications that were   (Orach Chaim #331:9) writes: At the time of the Gemara, if the baby
 discovered in recent years. However, until 100 years ago, this illness   was not washed with hot water before and after the circumcision, he
 was liable to cause blindness and danger to life. Therefore, there is no   would be in danger. Nowadays, the practice is not to wash the baby at
 doubt that this illness is not halachically considered “mild pain.” Rath-  all, because natures have changed. If this applies to washing the baby,
                                                                                                                                                                               10
 er the medications we have nowadays prevent this type of infection   can we not say the same for the danger of eye-infections, especially
 from spreading or worsening. Therefore, when the baby has a serious   since theTeshuras Shai testified that he has never heard of someone
 conjunctive inflammation, with redness and secretion of pus, even   dying from an eye infection?
 though it can be easily treated, one should probably wait seven days.   Tosfos (Mo’ed Katan 11a) explain that our natures have changed,
 After all, fever can also be easily treated, yet we still wait seven days   and certain things that were beneficial to one’s health at the time of
 after recovery, as explained in the Shulchan Aruch cited above, since   the Gemara are nowadays dangerous. Even the remedies mentioned
 the seven days are not meant to cure the baby but these are the days   in the Gemara are of no benefit to us today. The Tiferes Yisrael (Shab-
 of rehabilitation after the recovery. So, too, in our case, we wait seven   bos 19:1, Boaz), in a discussion on the practice of metzitzah (sucking
 days after the baby has recovered from his infection.   blood) also raises the possibility that natures have changed nowadays.
  In Responsa Divrei Malkiel (Vol. 2 #131) there is a question about   Likewise, the Chazon Ish (Even Ha’ezer 12:7) says that in our days,
 a city where most of the newborn boys had secretions and mucus   nature has changed, and urine and sperm come from one duct, unlike
 in their eyes, and the mohelim delayed the circumcisions as a result.   in the days of the Talmud, when two ducts were postulated. Perhaps
 Some people were opposed to this. They claimed the mucus stemmed   we can say the same about an eye infection?
 from the eyelids, rather than the internal eye. Others claimed there   I posed this question to my father-in-law, Rav Y. S. Elyashiv zt”l,
 was no pain to the babies at all, and the secretions resulted from the   and he answered me: Had the physicians understood the words of
 babies looking at the light of the world more than necessary. As hap-  our Sages, and claimed that nature has changed, we would rely on
 pens to adults who look at the sun too much, these were the natural   their words. However, since they do not understand our Sages’ words
 effects on their eyes. The Sefer D’var Eliyahu writes that one needs   about the connection between the eye and the heart, this means we
 expertise to distinguish between different types of tears. Practically,   are missing knowledge on this topic, so we do not have the capacity to
 the Divrei Malkiel concludes:  say that nature has changed.
 1.  If one sees mucus in the eyes of a newborn, it is prohibited to   This is different than washing after circumcision (and metzitzah),
 circumcise  him.  One  should  not  pay  heed  to  the  physicians’   or the spermatic ducts. Regarding these things, the poskim understand
 words, which are in opposition to an explicit law in the Torah   the words of the Sages so they were able to determine that nature has
 and in the Talmud and poskim.  changed.




 282   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Shabbos in an Ophthalmology Department  2   299
   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318