Page 21 - Straive eBook: Redefining Your Peer Review Experience
P. 21

Straive  |   Redefining Your Peer Review Experience  21





            High-performance JEO teams share certain traits, key among which is placing a high value
            on customer service: whether communicating with authors, editors, or reviewers, these
            teams want to ensure that scholars get a prompt, polite and informative response. The
            second critical trait is an appreciation for continuous improvement. This is particularly
            apparent in larger JEO teams handling large volumes of articles, where reducing errors,
            simplifying complex processes, and reducing times from submission to acceptance can
            make a significant difference to workloads as well as customer satisfaction. The third trait is
            collaboration and knowledge sharing, both within the JEO and beyond to include the rest of
            the publishing team, editors, and other stakeholders. Combined, these traits represent some
            of the primary drivers for what are typically called Lean process improvements (6Sigma,
            2017).



                                                                  Customer focused
                                                                  author, reviewer and
                                                                  editor communication



                                   Lean                           Collaboration with
                                 process                          editors and publishers
                              improvement
                                                                  to optimise peer review


                                                                  Continuously improving
                                                                  processes to reduce
                                                                  turnaround time










       Suggestions

           • Check in with your JEO team
              and ask them what suggestions
              they have for improving your
              peer review processes.
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26