Page 22 - AM230829
P. 22

22      ENGLISH                                             AWEMainta                                 Diamars, 29 Augustus 2023





       Aruba’s Fiscal Challenges:


       The Impact of Rejecting RAft








            ruba, a picturesque Caribbean par-

       Aadise, is currently  grappling with
       significant fiscal decisions that will di-
       rectly  affect  its  residents.  The  Aruba
       Trade  & Industry Association (ATIA),

       Aruba Hotel  & Tourism Association
       (AHATA), Comerciantenan Uni (CUA),
       and Camara di Comercio (KVK) have
       calculated the potential financial bur-

       den on Aruban families if the govern-
       ment and parliament reject RAft, a fis-
       cal framework proposed by the King-
       dom of the Netherlands.



       Without RAft, the Aruban government
       would need to borrow  money at a
       higher interest rate, which could cost

       Aruba at least AFL 30 million annually.
       Ultimately, it is the people of Aruba who
       would bear this additional cost. Even
       though  Aruba already has a high tax

       burden, this  new debt would require
       each family to contribute an additional
       AFL 870 per year.



       Meanwhile, the Aruban government
       has  already agreed  to accept RAft
       when  borrowing money  from  the
       Netherlands. Whether using LAft (local

       law) or RAft (Kingdom law), the same
       budgetary rules  will apply. If Aruba
       now refuses to adhere to these finan-
       cial regulations  within a RAft, each

       Aruban family will still have to pay at
       least AFL 870 more in taxes each year
       to cover the consequences of this deci-
       sion.



       To  prevent  further  financial  strain  on
       Aruba’s already tax-burdened commu-
       nity,  our  government  and parliament

       must make a practical decision rather             finances  remain  secure  without  over-         costs for its residents, while accepting
       than an emotional one. It is crucial to           burdening its citizens.                          it  could  provide  stability  and  finan-
       consider the long-term fiscal stability of                                                         cial security. Balancing the emotional
       the island and its residents. Embracing           In summary, Aruba faces a critical               aspects of this  decision with prac-

       RAft might be the most responsible                decision  regarding  its  fiscal  future.        ticality is essential to safeguard  the
       path forward, ensuring that Aruba’s               Rejecting RAft could lead to increased           well-being of Aruba and its people
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27