Page 44 - Business Valuation for Estates & Gift Taxes
P. 44

  Each company had audited financial statements, a board of directors with independent members
                       and an audit committee, and management subject to review and direction by that board.


               Several widely available commercial products have facilitated the analyses of restricted stock and pre-
               IPO transactions. These tools generally provide the user with multiple search criteria, enabling the val-
               uation analyst to drill down through multiple data fields to identify potentially relevant transactions or
               characteristics.

        The Mandelbaum Factors


               Perhaps the most widely cited authoritative guidance for consideration of liquidity impairment is Judge
               David Laro’s decision in the 1995 Tax Court case of Mandelbaum v. Commissioner.   fn 5   While the deci-
               sion does not distinguish between marketability and liquidity, it does lay out 10 factors (each subjective
               to some degree) to analyze and quantify the degree to which a security should be discounted from its
               theoretical fully liquid (and marketable) value. The court used restricted stock and pre-IPO studies as a
               starting point and compared the subject company to the studies based on the following factors:

                   1.  Private versus public sales of the stock


                   2.  Financial statement analysis

                   3.  Company’s dividend policy

                   4.  Company’s nature, history, position in the industry, and economic outlook

                   5. Company’s management


                   6.  Degree of control transferred with block of shares to be valued

                   7. Restrictions on transferability of stock

                   8.  Holding period for the stock

                   9.  Company’s redemption policy

                   10. Costs associated with affecting a public offering


               Note that there is an inherent overlap, particularly in factors 1, 3, and 4, with core considerations in the
               development of a discount rate. Valuation analysts should be aware that because of this overlap, there
               exists the potential for double-counting an area of risk in developing an opinion of value.

               While these factors are, to some degree, subjective, many were analyzed in the earlier studies to develop
               the magnitude and direction of their influence on observed discounts. The Mandelbaum case analysis
               laid out by Judge Laro is a synthesis of the conclusions of the earlier studies. The Mandelbaum case re-
               mains a core analytic tool notwithstanding either its age or its lack of discrimination between marketa-
               bility and liquidity.





        fn 5
            Mandelbaum v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1995 -255, June 12, 1995.

          Page 42                                                                                   ©2015, AICPA
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49