Page 143 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 143

INDIVIDUALS



         she had agreed to manage his trading   filing separately, did not result in an   to family members with complicated
         account. The Fifth Circuit upheld the   impermissible double deduction under   IRA assets. In IRS Letter Ruling
         Tax Court’s determination, finding that   the matching design of the alimony   202140011, the decedent named his
         under the origin-of-the-claim doctrine   regime. The taxpayer’s alimony deduc-  trust as the beneficiary of his personal
         the deductions did not relate to the   tion should be properly viewed as being   IRA and the IRA he inherited from
         taxpayer’s engagement in a trade or busi-  matched against his former spouse’s ali-  his brother. The beneficiary trust was
         ness for purposes of Sec. 162.    mony income, not against his excluded   allowed to use trustee-to-trustee trans-
                                           wage income.                      fers so that each child of the decedent
         Sec. 213: Medical, dental, and                                      received interest in two trusts. One
         other expenses                    Secs. 262 and Sec. 280F:          trust would list the name of the father’s
         In separate IRS news releases,    Personal, living, and family      trust and the name of the trust for that
         IR-2021-66 (March 26, 2021) and   expenses                          particular child; required minimum
         IR-2021-181 (Sept. 10, 2021), the   In Warque,28 the Tax Court denied an   distributions (RMDs) would be based
         Service ruled that expenses incurred   IRS agent’s deductions for unreim-  upon the life expectancy of the oldest
         when purchasing personal protective   bursed employee business expenses. Paul   of the decedent’s children. The other
         equipment to prevent the spread of   Warque lived in Nevada but worked in   trust would list the uncle’s name and
         COVID-19 and expenses incurred    the Laguna Niguel, Calif., IRS exami-  the name of the trust for that particular
         for home testing are considered medi-  nation office. He deducted his travel   child; RMDs would be based on the
         cal expenses and are deductible if the   expenses as unreimbursed employee   decedent’s remaining life expectancy
         taxpayer’s qualified medical expenses   business expenses. Travel expenses may   as determined when he inherited his
         exceed 7.5% of AGI. As qualified medi-  be deducted under Sec. 162(a)(2) (in-  brother’s IRA. The ruling made clear
         cal expenses, these are also eligible to be   cluding the use of “listed property” as   that this result was not affected by
         paid or reimbursed under various flexible   defined in Sec. 280F(d)(4) and including   the change to inherited IRAs enacted
         spending accounts (FSAs), health reim-  passenger automobiles) if they are ordi-  in the SECURE Act29 because the
         bursement arrangements (HRAs), and   nary and necessary and if incurred while   death occurred before 2020, before
         health spending accounts (HSAs).   away from home and in the pursuit of   the applicability date of the SECURE
           According to IRS Letter Ruling   a trade or business. The key issue here   Act amendments.
         202114001, a male same-sex couple’s   was the location of his “home.” The   Earned income: A 2021 case
         medical costs and fees related to egg do-  Tax Court found that the taxpayer’s tax   looked at the definition of earned
         nation, in vitro fertilization procedures,   home was in Laguna Niguel, noting that   income for purposes of making a con-
         and gestational surrogacy did not qualify   he rented a room near there and that his   tribution to a retirement plan.30 Gayle
         as deductible medical expenses. Howev-  position was not temporary. The court   Gaston was receiving deferred com-
         er, medical costs and fees directly attrib-  concluded that his commuting expenses   pensation as a successful representative
         utable to the taxpayers, including sperm   for travel between his rented room and   of Mary Kay Inc. after her mandatory
         donation and freezing, were deductible.  his place of business were nondeductible   retirement age. The income was subject
                                           under Sec. 262. Other employee business   to self-employment tax. In addition,
         Sec. 215: Alimony                 expense deductions related to clothing   she operated businesses selling products
         In Leyh,27 the taxpayer was entitled to an   and personal care items were also deter-  and acting. The IRS treated the retail
         alimony deduction for amounts paid, via   mined to be personal expenses and not   businesses as not engaged in for profit
         payroll deductions, from wages through   deductible under Sec. 262(a).   under Sec. 183 and treated the deferred
         the employer’s cafeteria plan, to pay                               compensation as retirement income.
         for his then-spouse’s health insurance   Sec. 401: Qualified pension,   To deduct a retirement contribu-
         pursuant to a pre-2019 separation agree-  profit-sharing, and stock   tion, a self-employed person must
         ment. The Tax Court found that allow-  bonus plans                  have income from personal services.
         ing the husband an alimony deduction,   Transfer of IRA assets to trust:   The Tax Court held that the retire-
         when he and his spouse filed married   The IRS issued a private letter ruling   ment contribution deductions were not

         27.  Leyh, 157 T.C. No. 7 (2021).                     of IRAs and qualified plans must withdraw all money from inherited accounts
         28.  Warque, T.C. Summ. 2021-18.                      within 10 years.
         29.  Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of   30.  Gaston, T.C. Memo. 2021-107.
            2019, Division O of P.L. 116-94. Under the SECURE Act, most beneficiaries



         34  March 2022                                                                       The Tax Adviser
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148