Page 331 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 331

that this allocation is only done when   sale of the Mercer Island house. Based   to prove that this makes a difference
         the taxpayer determines he or she has   on the facts before it, the court stated   by presenting evidence that they used
         met the ownership and use require-  that the Weberts did not have any resi-  the house for any days during the five-
         ments. While the parties had not   dential use during the five-year period   year period ending on the date of the
         argued the point, in the Tax Court’s   ending on the date of the sale, and,   sale and, thus, would be entitled to a
         view the exception to nonqualified use   consequently, under the Sec. 121(c)   partial exclusion if the primary reason
         for temporary absences due to health   exclusion limitation formula, their   the house was sold was the change in
         conditions in Sec. 121(b)(5)(C)(ii)(III)   exclusion would be zero. Therefore,   Catherine’s health. If the Tax Court’s
         did not override the use requirements   in the absence of additional argument   description of the facts regarding the
         for the Sec. 121(a) exclusion. Thus,   from the Weberts about the use of   Weberts’ use of the house in its order
         because the Weberts did not meet the   the house, a trial would not be needed   is accurate, it would appear that there
         use requirement, it made no difference   to decide whether Catherine’s health   is little or no chance of the couple’s
         whether Catherine’s health problems   problems were the primary reason for   doing that.
         would allow any use to be character-  their sale of the Mercer Island house.  Webert, T.C. Memo. 2022-32   ■
         ized as nonqualified use.
           In addition, the Tax Court observed   Reflections
         that while Catherine’s health problems   Based on the Tax Court’s order, it   Contributor
         might make the Weberts eligible for   would seem likely that the Weberts   James A. Beavers, CPA, CGMA, J.D.,
         the Sec. 121(c) exclusion, that exclu-  will prevail on the issue of whether the   LL.M., is The Tax Adviser’s tax techni-
         sion provision, as discussed above, is   Mercer Island house was sold by rea-  cal content manager. For more infor-
         subject to a limitation based on use   son of the change in Catherine’s health   mation about this column, contact
         that might prevent the Weberts from   if the case goes to trial. However, to   thetaxadviser@aicpa.org.
         excluding any of their gain from the   get to trial, the Weberts will still need














           Welcome to



           the age of



           specialization.





            When you become a member of an AICPA  specialized section,
                                                 ®
            you’re joining an elite community of like-minded peers. You’re also giving
            yourself high-quality, curated content, free CPE and webcasts on hot topics, delivered
            by the sharpest minds in the profession. Most of all, you’ll get the needed support
            to flourish and grow.
            Learn more or join today: aicpa.org/sections


            © 2021 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved. 2103-62839


         2103-62839 Section Ads_CMYK.indd   2                                                       4/29/21   9:40 AM
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336