Page 515 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 515

election by an LLC that could involve   obtains the requisite 80% control of   proportion to the shareholders’ stock
         the receipt of boot by the transferor for   the corporation immediately after the   ownership interest. Sec. 1366 provides
         purposes of Sec. 351(b). Nevertheless,   transfer. In the partnership context, Sec.   that “there shall be taken into account
         where the corporation assumes liabilities   72126 does not contain any such con-  the shareholder’s pro rata share of the
         of the transferor and the liabilities as-  trol requirement.        corporation’s (A) items of income (in-
         sumed exceed the adjusted tax basis of                              cluding tax-exempt income), loss, deduc-
         the assets transferred, gain is recognized   Example 1: For example, assume   tion, or credit the separate treatment of
         to the transferor to the extent of such   CPA firm XY LLC elected to be   which could affect the liability for tax of
         excess.24                           treated as an S corporation. X and Y   any shareholder, and (B) nonseparately
           It is important to have a definitive   each own 50%. Z has his own CPA   computed income or loss.” (Emphasis
         tax basis balance sheet before the LLC   firm, a single-member LLC treated   added.)
         elects S status. Recognized partnership   as a disregarded entity. XY LLC has   The pro rata share is calculated on
         gain could result if the liabilities of the   offered to admit Z as a 10% member   a per share, per day basis under Sec.
         LLC exceed the tax basis of the assets   in exchange for Z’s contribution or   1377(a). Possibly the nearest concept to
         at the effective date of the S election.   transfer of his clients (represented by   a special allocation would be through
         Recognized individual gain could result   goodwill with no tax basis). XY LLC   shareholder compensation adjustments;
         if the liabilities of the disregarded entity   does not want to own Z’s LLC or as-  but there are limits to this technique,
         exceed the tax basis at the effective date   sume any of his liabilities. Immedi-  including reasonableness tests.
         of the S election.                  ately after the transfer to XY LLC, Z   On the other hand, partnership
                                             will only own 10% and thus fail the   taxation offers greater flexibility in al-
         Reason 3: Potential gain            80% control requirement. Z’s con-  locating items of income and deduction.
         recognition to new members          tribution or transfer of clients to XY   Provided that the allocations meet the
         contributing property               LLC will result in gain recognition   substantial-economic-effect tests of Sec.

         A new member that receives a member-  to Z as though Z sold the clients,   704(b) and the regulations promulgated
         ship interest in exchange for property   with a potential zero tax basis, to XY   thereunder, a partnership can allocate
         contributed to an LLC that has elected   LLC in exchange for a membership   items of income and deduction among
         S status may recognize taxable gain as   interest. If XY LLC did not make   its partners without regard to the part-
         though the property were sold to the   an S election and was classified as a   ners’ ownership interest percentages. A
         LLC. New members of the LLC who     partnership for tax purposes, no gain   comprehensive discussion of “substantial
         contribute property to an LLC that has   or loss to Z would result upon Z’s   economic effect” is beyond the scope
         elected S status will need to consider   contribution or transfer of clients to   of this article. Only the highlights are
         the 80% control requirement of Sec. 351   XY LLC under Sec. 721(a).27  presented below.
         rather than the more lenient require-                                 Determining whether an allocation
         ments of Sec. 721 under the partnership   Reason 4: No special      meets the substantial-economic-effect
         provisions of Subchapter K. As refer-  allocations                  test requires a two-part analysis. First,
         enced above,25 a transferor(s) of prop-  An S corporation offers no flexibil-  the allocation must have economic ef-
         erty to a corporation will generally not   ity with respect to allocating items of   fect, and second, the allocation must be
         recognize gain or loss if the transferor(s)   income and deduction that are not in   substantial.28 The regulations provide



         24.  Sec. 357(c). Further, if the principal purpose of the taxpayer with respect to   26.  “No gain or loss shall be recognized to a partnership or to any of its partners
            an assumption of liabilities is tax avoidance of federal income tax or there   in the case of a contribution of property to the partnership in exchange for
            is no bona fide business purpose for the assumption of liabilities, the total   an interest in the partnership” (Sec. 721(a)).
            amount of the liabilities assumed (not merely the excess of liabilities over   27.  As a potential workaround, Z can also elect S status for his LLC prior to the
            tax basis of assets) is treated as boot for purposes of calculating gain under   transaction, and merge his LLC/S corporation into XY LLC under the corpo-
            Sec. 351(b). The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to prove by the clear   rate reorganization provisions of Sec. 368. However, under this structure, XY
            preponderance of the evidence that the principal purpose did not involve   LLC would be succeeding to Z’s entity (including liabilities) rather than merely
            the avoidance of federal income tax and that there was a bona fide business   the assets. In addition, there is an issue whether the “pre-incorporation” step
            purpose for the assumption of the liabilities (Sec. 357(b)).  violates the “immediately after test” of Sec. 351 under a step-transaction
         25.  See fn. 22.                                      analysis due to the existence of a preconceived plan of a merger into the
                                                               transferee S corporation.
                                                            28.  Regs. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(i).




         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                                October 2022  29
   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520