Page 38 - REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES
P. 38

Chapter 4



              Appliance           retention

















              The  term  'retention'  can  have  two  completely  rated  by the  action  of the  clasp. The  design  by
              different  meanings  within  orthodontics.  It  is  Adams  (1955)  of the modified  arrowhead clasp
              used to describe the support that is given to the   now known  as  the  Adams'  clasp represented  a
              teeth after a period of orthodontic treatment in   major  advance  in  removable  appliance  reten-
              order  to  maintain  their  improved  alignment  tion.
              and  relationship.  In  the  field  of  removable
              appliances  the  same  term  is  also  used  to
              describe  the  resistance  of  the  appliance  to  Posterior  retention
              displacement.  This  chapter  is  concerned  with
              the  retention  of  the  appliance  in  the  mouth.  The  Adams'  clasp  (Figure  4.1)
              Chapter  11  covers the use of removable appli-
              ances as retainers.                    This  clasp,  like  most  others,  is  made  from
                Appliance  retention  is provided  by  wires,  in  0.7 mm  stainless  steel  wire  or  from  Elgiloy
              the  form of clasps  and bows.  Good retention  is  (although for clasps on deciduous teeth  0.6 mm
              essential  if  treatment  is  to  proceed  efficiently  wire  is  more  suitable).  It  engages  the  mesio-
              and needs to be planned carefully. This is partic-  buccal  and  disto-buccal  undercuts  that  can  be
              ularly important if headgear is to be  worn  with  found  on  the  crown  of  almost  every  tooth.  A
              the appliance. Even where retention is good it is   depth  of undercut  of about  0.25  mm  is ideal.
              prudent to reduce to a minimum any forces that   In  children,  where  the  anatomical  crowns  of
              tend  to  displace  the  appliance.  Examples  of  the  teeth  may  not  be  fully  exposed,  undercuts
              such  forces  might  be  springs  acting  on  cuspal  may be  difficult to locate, but they can generally
              inclines, extraoral force  applied in  a downward   be  found  at  the  mesio-buccal  and  disto-buccal
              direction,  or  rocking  of  the  appliance  due  to
              contact of the lower incisors upon an excessively
              undercut  anterior  bite  plane.  The  patient  will
              find it harder to tolerate an appliance that is not
              a  firm  fit  and  progress  is  likely  to  suffer.
                When  removable  appliances  were  first  used,
              clasping  was  a  particular  problem.  The  arrow-
              head  clasp  was  one  of  the  most  successful
              designs  but  was  awkward  to  make  and  to  Figure 4.1  An Adams' clasp (0.7 mm wire). The
                                                                                    and
              adjust.  The  arrowhead  engages  the  embrasure  clasp engages  undercuts on the  mesio-buccal stands
                                                                       tooth.
                                                                   of the
                                                             aspects
                                                                               bridge
                                                                            The
                                                     disto-buccal
              between teeth but, although  this can  offer good
                                                     clear of the buccal surface and the wire is closely
              retention,  it  is  easy  to  damage  the  gingival  adapted to the tooth where  it passes across the
              papillae  and  the  adjacent  teeth  can  be  sepa-  contact  area.
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43