Page 85 - Buku Model ADISI
P. 85

BUKU MODEL ADISI         82






                        Widarti, H. R., Wiyarsi, A., Yamtinah, S., Shidiq, A. S., Sari, M. E. F., Fauziah, P.
                            N., & Rokhim, D. A. (2025). Analysis of Content Development in Chemical
                            Materials  Related  to  Ethnoscience:  a  Review.  Journal  of  Education  and
                            Learning, 19(1), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21210

                        Wiratma, I. G. L., & Yuliamiastuti, I. A. A. (2023). Ethnochemistry Potential of
                            Vines  Contained  in  Lontar  Usada  Taru  Pramana  on  Students’  Scientific
                            Explanation  Skills  through  Task-based  Learning.  Jurnal  Pendidikan  IPA
                            Indonesia, 12(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42826

                        Wulandari, A. (2023). Profil Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Berbantuan Padlet
                            Dengan Pendekatan Socioscientific Issue Gelombang Bunyi. Jurnal Jaringan
                            Penelitian Pengembangan Penerapan Inovasi Pendidikan (Jarlitbang), 87–
                            94. https://doi.org/10.59344/jarlitbang.v9i1.127

                        Yaman, F. (2018). Effects of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on the Quality
                            of  Prospective  Science  Teachers’  Argumentative  Writing  and  Their
                            Understanding of Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science
                            and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-
                            016-9788-9

                        Yang, Y., Cai, S., Wen, Y., Li, J., & Jiao, X. (2021). AR Learning Environment
                            Integrated  with  EIA  Inquiry  Model:  Enhancing  Scientific  Literacy  and
                            Reducing Cognitive Load of Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22).
                            https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212787
                        Yerimadesi, Y. (2023). The Effectiveness of Guided Discovery  Learning-Based
                            Salt. AIP Conference Proceedings, April 24 2.

                        Yıldız-Feyzioğlu, E., & Kıran, R. (2022). Investigating the Relationships between
                            Self-efficacy  for  Argumentation  and  Critical  Thinking  Skills.  Journal  of
                            Science         Teacher          Education,         33(5),        555–577.
                            https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1967568

                        Yunus,  R.  (2018).  Teori  Belajar  Sibernatik  dan  Implementasinya  Dalam
                            Pelaksanaan  Diklat.  Journal  of  Education  Science,  4(2),  32–41.
                            https://jurnal.uui.ac.id/index.php/jes/article/view/290/98

                        Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2005).  Beyond  STS  A  Research‐Based  Framework  for
                            Socioscientific Issues Education.(pp. 357–377).
                        Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific_Issues_as_a_Curriculum_E.pdf.

                        Zeidler,  D.  L.,  Herman,  B.  C.,  &  Sadler,  T.  D.  (2019).  New  Directions  in
                            Socioscientific Issues Research. 1–9.

                        Zhao, G., Zhao, R., Li, X., Duan, Y., & Long, T. (2023). Are Preservice Science
                            Teachers  (PSTs)  Prepared  for  Teaching  Argumentation?  Evidence  from  a
                            University Teacher Preparation Program in China. Research in Science and
                            Technological             Education,            41(1),            170–189.
                            https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1872518




                                                                                             LISA UTAMI
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86