Page 75 - Lisa utami
P. 75

BUKU MODEL ADISI         72






                            Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation skills. Research in Science and
                            Technological              Education,              32(1),             1–20.
                            https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071
                        Cetin,  Pinar  Seda, Eymur,  G.,  &  Erenler,  S.  (2024).  The  Development  of  Pre-
                            Service  Teachers’  Argumentation  Self-Efficacy  through  Argumentation-
                            Based Chemistry  Instruction.  Chemistry Education Research and Practice,
                            25(3), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00337j
                        Cetin, Plnar Seda, & Eymur, G. (2017). Developing Students’ Scientific Writing
                            and Presentation Skills through  Argument Driven  Inquiry:  An Exploratory
                            Study.     Journal    of    Chemical      Education,    94(7),    837–843.
                            https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00915
                        Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the Gender
                            Gap  of  Children’s  Engagement  in  Learning  Science  and  Argumentation
                            Through  a  Modified  Argument-Driven  Inquiry.  International  Journal  of
                            Science      and      Mathematics      Education,      17(4),     635–655.
                            https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9896-9

                        Chin, C. C., Yang, W. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2016). Argumentation in a Socioscientific
                            Context and its Influence on  Fundamental and Derived Science Literacies.
                            International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 603–617.
                            https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9606-1

                        Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The Effects of Argumentation Scaffolds on
                            Argumentation and Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and
                            Development, 50(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505022

                        Chowdhury,  T.  B.  M.,  Holbrook,  J.,  &  Rannikmäe,  M.  (2020).  Socioscientific
                            Issues  within  Science  Education  and  their  Role  in  Promoting  the  Desired
                            Citizenry.    Science    Education     International,   31(2),    203–208.
                            https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.10

                        Christenson, N., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2015a). A Framework for Teachers
                            Assessment of Socio-Scientific Argumentation: An Example Using the GMO
                            issue.    Journal     of   Biological     Education,    49(2),    204–212.
                            https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.923486

                        Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The Relationship
                            of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on
                            Socioscientific  Issues.  Research  in  Science  Education,  44(4),  581–601.
                            https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6

                        Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2017). Science and Language
                            Teachers’  Assessment  of  Upper  Secondary  Students’  Socioscientific
                            Argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
                            15(8), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9746-6

                        Christenson,  N.,  &  Walan,  S.  (2023).  Developing  Pre-service  Teachers’




                                                                                             LISA UTAMI
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80