Page 113 - FREN-C2021 PROCEEDINGS
P. 113

Finally, customers are in the action loyalty stage when their return intention has been “transformed
               into readiness to act” (Oliver, 1999). Once customers develop this deep level of commitment, they
               will  possess  a  resistance  towards  changing  to  competitors’ offerings  and as a result,  the  switching
               behaviours will be minimized. True loyal customers are the customers who hold a positive attitude
               toward the mobile service provider (Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001; Matzler et al., 2008; Kiyani et
               al., 2012; Lin and Lee, 2012 Bowen & Chen McCain, 2015).

               Customer  retention  is  the  main  strategy  for  service-oriented  industries  such  as  the  mobile  service
               provider  industry  to  stay  sustained.  Customer  retention  was  defined  as  how  a  firm  can  keep  its
               customers and maintain its customers' portfolio (Al-Gharaibah, 2020; Gronroos, 2000; Mahmoud et
               al., 2018). Previous studies postulated that an increase in customer retention can increase the profit of
               companies by 5 folds (Al-Gharaibah, 2020; Hawkin & Hoon, 2019). Customer retention may also
               reduce the cost of marketing and operational costs of attracting new customers, which brings more
               profitability (Cham et al., 2018; Cham et al., 2019; Cheah et al., 2019; Cheng et al., 2020). In the
               mobile service provider industry, customer retention helps companies to retain their customers from
               opting out to another service provider. Managers agreed that customer complaints play a significant
               role in company performance. However, customer complaints enable the provision of more valuable
               information  for  new  development  (Y.  Hwang  &  Mattila,  2020).  With  this  valuable  information,
               companies can formulate new strategies and innovations to build up the switching barrier.

               Brand Credibility
               According to Rosli et al. (2019), brand reputation is derived from the credibility of source literature.
               The definition of brand credibility is based on the early research suggested by Hovland et al., (1953)
               relating to the communicator's credibility, and then adapted by Erdem and Swait (1998, 2004), Erdem
               et  al.  (2002),  and  Swait  and  Erdem  (2002)  to  the  brand  background  (2007).  Brand  credibility  is
               described as a brand's credibility in producing or performing the products and services that have been
               promised (Erdem & Swait, 2004; Kiatkawsin & Sutherland, 2020; Rizwan et al., 2014; Rosli et al.,
               2019).

               An  analysis  of  the literature  by  Rosli  et  al.  (2019) reveals that  three  brand  reputation  components
               include  trustworthiness,  competence  (Erdem  and  Swait,  1998,  2004;  Erdem  et  al.,  2006),  and
               attractiveness  (Erdem  and  Swait,  1998,  2004;  Hovland,  Janis,  and  Kelly,  1953;  Keller  and  Aaker,
               1997; Maathuis et al., 2004; Sternthal and Craig, 2002;). Trustworthiness refers to the ability of the
               company to achieve what it has vowed. It relates to the degree to which an item is deemed an honest
               source  of  knowledge,  goods,  services,  and  other  matters  (Maathuis  et  al.,  2004).  As  it  has  been
               marketed, it is the expectation for the brand to deliver. Expertise, on the other hand, represents the
               ability to deliver the brand to the desired expectations in future service meetings (Baek et al., 2010;
               Kiatkawsin & Sutherland, 2020; Rosli et al., 2019). Both trustworthiness and expertise are determined
               by the cumulative impact of a brand’s previous marketing strategies and actions (Erdem and Swait,
               1998).

               Trust
               Rousseau,  Sitkin,  Burt,  and  Camerer  (1998)  define  trust  as  “a  psychological  state  composing  the
               intention to accept vulnerability based on expectations of the intentions or behaviour of another” (p.
               395). According to Ravald and Gonroos (1996), trust is a higher degree of aggregate assessment than
               satisfaction, and that satisfaction is an integral source of trust. In essence, confidence represents the
               seller’s belief that they will keep their word and fulfil the promised position obligations (Anderson &
               Narus,  1990;  Dwyer,  Schurr,  &  Oh.,  1987).  Long-term  relationships  are  fostered  because  trust
               decreases misunderstanding and the risk of opportunistic actions (Hausman, 2001). In combination,
               building consumer trust is regarded as the focal task of service marketers because of the apparent
               intrinsic nature of services (Choi & La, 2013; Liljander & Roos, 2002).



                                                          [108]
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118