Page 74 - FREN-C2021 PROCEEDINGS
P. 74

Table 5. Diagnostic Tests for Static Model
                                                        P-values  of the  tests

                                 VIF        H         SC                          Strategy
                                 1.09     0.0000    0.0120                   Random effects GLS regression
                                                                             model with cluster option
                 Notes: (1) VIF: variance inflation factors, (2) H: heteroskedasticity & (3) SC: serial correlation

               Considering  the  various  diagnostic  tests  that  have  been  conducted  and  the  remedial  procedure
               undertaken, this paper may say that there is enough evidence to conclude that the examined statistical
               test satisfies the key assumptions of linear regression. As shown in Table 6, the results of the regression
               results suggest that return on equity (the proxy for profitability) is the only variable found to have a
               significant positive relationship with the efficiency of the firms. Consistent with the findings of the
               previous studies that any firms that wish to increase their level of efficiency need to pay attention to
               the level of profitability generated by the firms (Isola et al., 2020).  Consistent with the previous study
               such as (Makhlouf et al., 2017), the results also suggest that board independence does not appear to be
               significantly  related  to  efficiency.  The  insignificant  relationship  between  board  independence  and
               efficiency may be attributed to the use of a different proxy for board independence. In addition to that,
               return on equity seems to have the greatest influence on the level of working capital, which is explained
               by the highest t-value of 2.55.

                                                 Table 6. Regression Results
                         Board Independence                16.2739
                                                           (0.98)
                         Return on Equity                  6.5840** (2.55)

                         Constant                          -2.3704
                                                           (-0.45)
                         N                                 180.0000
                         r2_o                              0.0505
                         p                                 0.0034
                         chi2                              11.3646
                       Notes (1) t statistics in parentheses, (2)* p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01

                                                       Conclusion
               This paper has examined the determinants of efficiency for shariah-compliant firms listed under the
               consumer products sector. The result suggests that return on equity is the only variable found to have a
               statistically  significant  with  the  efficiency  of  the  firms.  Although  this  paper  has  provided  us with
               empirical evidence, several areas need to be improved with future empirical research. First, this paper
               did not provide any sectoral analysis on the level of working capital. Future research should explore
               whether industry classification would have any effect on the level of working capital and its relationship
               with the selected determinants. Second, this paper utilizes Stata command vselect in determining the
               optimal model. A future researcher might want to explore other techniques in determining the optimal
               model. Lastly, this paper only investigated a limited number of independent variables, because of that
               there could be incomplete representations of explanations in the use of proxies or the presence of other
               variables influencing the performance determinants of all companies. We suggested for another author
               use another variable that was not included in this research.







                                                           [69]
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79