Page 84 - DUA Manual del participante - Plataforma

Universal Design for Learning April, 2019

References

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent:
Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’
engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Bruchmuller, K., & Hacker, S. (2005). Supporting learning with
interactive multimedia through active integration of representations. Instructional Science,
33(1), 73-95.
CAST, Center for Applied Special Technology (2011) Universal Design for Learning
Guidelines version 2.0, Wakefield, MA. Retrieved from
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/downloads
Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M.
T., Baron-Lopez, F. J. & Vega-Cuesta, M. (2013). The association between academic
engagement and achievement in health sciences students. Medical Education, 13(33).
Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/13/33
Chita-Tegmark, M., Gravel, J. W., de Lourdes, M., Serpa, B., Domings, Y., & Rose, D. H.
(2012). Using the universal design for learning framework to support culturally diverse
learners. Journal of Education 192(1), 17-22.
Firchow, N. (2016, March 11). Universal Design for Learning — improved access for all.
Retrieved from: https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/universal-design-for-learning-
improved-access-for-all/
Goldowsky, B. N. & Coyne, M. (2016). Supporting engagement and comprehension online
through multiple means of expression. In the Proceedings of the 13th Web for All
Conference. New York, Article 39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2899475.2899488
Jhangiani, R. S. (2017). Ditching the “Disposable assignment” in favor of open pedagogy. In
W. Altman & L. Stein (Eds.), Essays from Excellence in Teaching. Retrieved from:
http://teachpsych.org/E-xcellence-in-Teaching-Blog
Kennette, L. N., & Wilson, N. A. (2018). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Student and
faculty perceptions, Unpublished manuscript, School of Interdisciplinary Studies, Durham
College, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and
social affordances for science understanding. Learning & Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
Lang, J. L. (2016). Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lepp, G. A., & Fierke, K. K. (2017). Expanding student perspectives in an authentic learning
environment. Transformative Dialogues. 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.kpu.ca/td/past-
issues/10-3
Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of
Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183-199, DOI: 10.1080/0309826032000107496.
Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE
benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: The Magazine of
Higher Learning, 42(1), 16–22.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic
motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological
Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300.
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to
tie nautical knots. Learning & Instruction, 14(3), 293-305.

5 Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal Volume 12 Issue 1 April 2019