Page 71 - Clinical Manual of Small Animal Endosurgery
P. 71

Diagnostic Arthroscopy  59

                                  should  be  further  evaluated  mechanically  using  an  instrumented  tech-
                                  nique. The cranial aspect of the humeral head is most readily reached
                                  using an instrument placed cranially. Sometimes the ingress needle can
                                  be used for this purpose, despite the unfamiliar angulation of insertion,
                                  if triangulation has been achieved. If the ingress needle is readily visible
                                  and  its  direction  is  suitable,  a  cannulated  instrument  portal  can  be
                                  created following the same direction into the joint. Instrumented inspec-
                                  tion of the middle and caudal aspects of the shoulder requires a caudally
                                  placed  instrument  portal.  The  optimal  site  for  the  caudal  instrument
                                  portal is caudal and slightly distal to the tip of the acromion. In a middle-
                                  sized dog a needle is inserted into the shoulder joint approximately 2 cm
                                  caudal to the distal tip of the acromion, aiming to place the needle tip
                                  in the vicinity of the arthroscope tip, but avoiding crossing the arthro-
                                  scope. For the novice arthroscopist, an aiming device is invaluable for
                                  this triangulation. Once triangulation is achieved, an instrument portal
                                  can be established following an identical path to the joint cavity. Thick-
                                  ened cartilage should be probed to evaluate its integrity and adhesion to
                                  underlying subchondral bone. If radiological investigation suggests the
                                  presence  of  an  osteochondrosis  lesion,  arthroscopically  visible  fissures
                                  should be probed to check for the presence of an osteochondritis disse-
                                  cans flap in situ.
                                    Since shoulder disease is usually characterised by synovitis and syno-
                                  vial proliferation that affects the entire joint, it is rare that arthroscopic
                                  visual inspection detects only a single injured structure that is hyperaemic
                                  or fibrillated or covered in proliferated synovium and consequently iden-
                                  tifiable  as  the  only  cause  of  a  painful  shoulder.  Consequently,  instru-
                                  mented evaluation of the shoulder joint is also useful for assessing the
                                  integrity of the soft-tissue structures. When there is synovitis affecting
                                  the biceps tendon, instrumented probing and manipulation of the tendon
                                  can be helpful to reveal macroscopic tears in the tendon that are other-
                                  wise not visible on the surface most readily viewed. Arthroscopic inspec-
                                  tion and probing may identify tearing of the tendon fibres or adhesion
                                  between the tendon and an inflamed and constricted bicipital groove.
                                  The blunt probe is also useful to assess the mechanical integrity of the
                                  other  soft-tissue  structures,  including  the  glenohumeral  ligaments  and
                                  the subscapularis tendon.
                                    Due to the risk of accidentally removing the arthroscope, inspection
                                  of the lateral aspect of the shoulder joint is performed at the end of the
                                  arthroscopy.  The  arthroscope  is  returned  to  its  insertion  position  and
                                  slowly withdrawn from the joint while tilting caudally. Rotation of the
                                  light post towards the patient’s shoulder joint directs the arthroscopic
                                  view laterally within the joint. The lateral aspect of humeral head and
                                  of the glenoid cavity are viewed and, in the background, the craniolateral
                                  joint capsule and caudolateral joint capsule can be inspected with careful
                                  manipulation of the arthroscope and light post. An alternative approach
                                  to  the  arthroscopic  inspection  of  the  lateral  joint  compartments  uses
                                  an additional medially placed arthroscopic portal and a ‘hanging limb’
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76