Page 13 - BSAVA Guide to Pain Management in Small Animal Practice
P. 13

BSAVA Guide to Pain Management in Small Animal Practice



        VetBooks.ir  due to visceral a erents synapsing on spinal   to determine whether or not a patient is in
           cord neurones that receive information from
                                                  pain is to administer a dose of an analgesic
                                                  drug and utili e pain scores to monitor the
           somatic nociceptors.
              Pathological  chronic  pain is pain that is still   patient s response.
           present after the originating painful stimulus
           has disappeared. Chronic pain is mostly as a   Acute pain scales and pain
           result of C  bre activity. It is not stimulus   ethics
           speci c or protective and inevitably leads to    he provision of e ective pain relief in small
           morbidity. Both wind up and central    animals and its importance in relation to
           sensiti ation are involved in the development of   patient care and welfare is becoming more
           chronic pain states.                   widely accepted by the veterinary profession
              Phantom pain refers to perception of pain    Lascelles et al., 199 ; Paul  urphy et al.,
           from a part of the body that has been removed.      4;  athews et al.,   14 . Nevertheless,
           It is due to depolari ation in nerve endings that   studies suggest that there is no agreed  gold
           originally carried sensation from the   standard  provision of perioperative analgesia
           amputated limb.                        to small animal patients   ohoo and  ohoo,
                                                  1996;  illiams et al.,      . In several studies,
           Pain and quality of life               the clinician s di culty in recogni ing and
                                                  assessing pain is often raised as a reason for
           assessment methods in                  not administering analgesia, together with the
           dogs and cats                          fear of side e ects. Because of this there have
                                                  been ma or e orts to produce reliable,
            or many years pain treatment has been based   validated pain scoring systems taking into
           on the principle of  if it hurts us it will hurt them ,   account the painful conditions regularly
           which is a good starting point but is very much   encountered in small animal practice to allow
           a generali ation; this approach is almost a   targeted analgesic therapy clinically and to
           preconception of how likely a procedure is to be   support research and development of new
           painful but takes little account of the patient s   analgesic drugs  Sharkey,   1  .
           response. It could be said that this approach is a   It is accepted that the recognition and
           pre emptive pain scoring system based on the   assessment of pain in animals is problematic. In
           science of the preservation of the pain pathway   people, self reporting of pain is recogni ed as
           across mammalian species, with the addition of   the gold standard tool for measuring pain levels
           anthropomorphism and the pro ection of human     athew and  athew,      . In veterinary
           emotions and feelings on to animals. Arguably   medicine the recognition of pain relies on the
           the biggest breakthrough in small animal pain   sub ective interpretation of the patient s
           medicine has been the introduction of pain   physiology and behaviour by an observer.  hus,
           scoring systems, which have allowed us to   unlike in human medicine where  pain is what
           attempt to  uantify pain in patients and   the patient says it is , pain in veterinary patients
           therefore ad ust analgesia accordingly.   is better de ned as  what the observer says it is .
           Although incredibly helpful as a guide to pain    his leaves an unacceptable burden of proof of
           treatment, pain scoring systems should be used   the existence of pain on the skill and bias of the
           to guide analgesic therapy but pain scoring   observer unless standardi ed pain assessment
           should never override clinical examination and   tools are utili ed.  hus, pain scales or scoring
           decision making. In particular, companion   systems, with the ideal properties of validity,
           animals that are expected to be painful but   reliability and sensitivity to change   athews et
           score low on pain scales should always be   al.,   14 , are needed for veterinary patients.
           given the  bene t of doubt  and analgesia   Attempts to validate and accurately assess
           should not be withheld. Even with the utili ation   pain in animals initially began in the 198 s by,
           of pain scoring systems, the most accurate way   for example,  aylor and  oulton  1984 . Initial

           8



         Ch02 Pain Management.indd   8                                          19/12/2018   10:33
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18