Page 587 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 587

Chemical Carcinogenesis in Fishes                                           567


                       process; for example, BNF may alter cyp, increasing detoxification and reducing initial DNA damage
                       by AFB . Finally, I3C may alter AFB  pharmacokinetics.
                             1
                                                    1
                        As has been presented above, DEN is a complete carcinogen in the trout and medaka models. Inhibition
                       of the DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis was demonstrated using I3C (Fong et al., 1988). To test for
                       possible inhibitory effects on DEN-induced hepatic tumors, trout were prefed a diet containing BNF,
                                   ®
                       I3C, or Arochlor  1254 and, following a recovery period, were exposed to a tumorigenic concentration
                       of DEN in water for 24 hours. Fish were allowed to grow for 42 weeks and then assessed for liver tumor
                       formation. Liver DNA ethylguanine levels were reduced in I3C-pretreated fish, were increased in BNF-
                                                                       ®
                       pretreated fish, and showed no significant effect with Arochlor  1254. The authors suggested that I3C
                                                     6
                       inhibition was mediated by effects on O -ethylguanine formation and, therefore, on the initiation phase
                       of carcinogenesis.
                        Chlorophyllin (CHL), a food-grade derivative of the green plant pigment chlorophyll, proved to be a
                       potent, dose-responsive inhibitor of AFB –DNA adduction and hepatocarcinogenesis in the trout model
                                                      1
                       (Breinholt et al., 1995a). These effects occurred when CHL was fed in a diet containing AFB . When
                                                                                                1
                       CHL was fed after exposure to AFB , it neither enhanced nor suppressed AFB  liver tumorigenesis.
                                                                                     1
                                                    1
                       These findings suggest that CHL interferes with early events in AFB  carcinogenesis. A subsequent in
                                                                            1
                       vitro study (Breinholt et al., 1995b) revealed that CHL formed a strong noncovalent complex with AFB 1
                       and inhibited phase I metabolism. A third study by Breinholt et al. (1999) focused on the complex
                       formation and in situ protective mechanisms within the target organ, liver. Bioavailability differences
                       rather than in situ organ inhibitory mechanisms are likely the cause of the protection afforded by CHL.
                       Finally, the cancer prevention properties shown by CHL against AFB  were tested using another class
                                                                            1
                       of carcinogen, the PAHs (Harttig et al., 1996). Dibenzo(a,l)pyrene (DB(a,l)P) is the most carcinogenic
                       of the PAHs tested in the trout model to date. Features include the occurrence of tumors of liver, stomach,
                       and swim bladder. Use of this compound provided the opportunity to determine whether CHL would
                       be effective in inhibition of multi-organ carcinogenesis. CHL reduced DB(a,l)P toxicity, inhibited
                       DB(a,l)P–DNA adducts, and strongly inhibited DB(a,l)P mutagenesis in the Salmonella assay.
                        As we have seen, inhibition of chemical carcinogenesis, or cancer chemoprevention, has been studied
                       only in the trout model. Each of the examples presented herein suggests that the protection occurs by
                       inhibition of early events, including xenobiotic uptake or distribution and alteration in phase I metabolism
                       favoring detoxification. The final result of these changes is a net reduction in carcinogen–DNA adduction.
                       This does not mean that other mechanisms are not operative in later stages, as between initiation and
                       promotion or progression; they simply have not been addressed. Work to date has not considered prolif-
                       eration, differentiation, or cell death. As presented above, only one paper has included serial analysis with
                       emphasis on factors governing the cell cycle (Orner et al., 1998). The general approach has been to alter
                       early events reducing DNA adduction and then to determine the effect of such alteration on eventual
                       tumor incidence. What is now increasingly possible and is a critical challenge is a careful analysis during
                       pathogenesis of fish neoplasia incorporating self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to growth-
                       inhibitory (antigrowth) signals, evasion of programmed cell death (apoptosis), limitless replicative poten-
                       tial, sustained angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000).


                       Immunologic Factors
                       The immune system and its role in the carcinogenesis have been studied in mammalian models, although
                       parallel studies in fish models have yet to be conducted. Regulatory T (T-reg) cells are an important
                       component of the immune system that were implicated in cancer progression as early as 1974 (Umiel
                       and Globerson, 1974). Subsequent work during the 1980s focused on the disruption of T-reg cells and
                       attempted to induce tumor immunity (Orentas et al., 2006). It is the functional inhibition of such cells
                       that is currently the goal of effective anticancer immune therapies in humans. To date, only a limited
                       number of CD4 T-cell gene homologs have been isolated from fish, including pufferfish (Fugu rubripes)
                       (Suetaka et al., 2006), trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Dijkstra et al., 2005), sea lamprey (Petromyzon
                       marinus) (Pancer et al., 2004), and  channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) (GenBank Accession Nos.
                       ABD93355 and ABD93354). It is noteworthy that the CD4 homologs characterized thus far display
                       many of the structural motifs found in mammalian counterparts. An exception is a particular motif
   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592