Page 864 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 864

844                                                        The Toxicology of Fishes


                       1997; Toomey et al., 2001; Walker and Peterson, 1994b; Walker et al., 1991; Wright 2006). Brook trout
                       and rainbow trout are about 3 to 6 times less sensitive than lake trout, whereas the other species are 8
                       to 38 times less sensitive. The only species that has demonstrated greater sensitivity than lake trout
                       toward TCDD-induced toxicity is the bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), also a member of the charr
                       family (Cook et al., 2000). This latter study indicates that the bull trout has an LD  value approximately
                                                                                     50
                       one third that of the LD  of lake trout for the early-life-stage toxicity of TCDD.
                                         50
                        The reason for the greater risk posed by TCDD-like PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs to early-life-stage
                       survival of lake trout is not known. Elonen et al. (1998) suggested that the ability of non-salmonine fish
                       species to tolerate higher egg concentrations of TCDD might be related to their shorter development
                       time to swim-up. The time from hatch to swim-up and first feeding ranged from 1 to 18 days for the
                       non-salmonine species compared to 30 to 60 days for rainbow trout and up to 120 days for lake trout,
                       the longest development time. Comparison of post-swim-up TCDD elimination rates between the non-
                       salmonine species and lake trout suggests that lake trout with a long development time retain TCDD
                       longer than species with short development times; however, this might not be the complete explanation.
                       When induction of CYP1A mRNA is compared between rainbow trout and zebrafish cell cultures in
                       response to graded concentrations of TCDD (a condition in which species differences in TCDD elimi-
                       nation rate is less likely to be a factor), TCDD is still less potent in eliciting an AhR-mediated response
                       in zebrafish cells (Henry et al., 1997). This suggests that the species difference in potency of TCDD in
                       causing AhR-mediated responses may involve species differences in the AhR signaling pathway (TCDD
                       binding to AhR, dimerization of AhR with ARNT, DNA binding of TCDD/AhR/ARNT, or transactiva-
                       tion). Alternatively, the fish species that are most sensitive toward TCDD are also those species that are
                       more oxygen sensitive. If, indeed, the cardiovascular system is an initial target for TCDD, species that
                       are more sensitive to disruptions in oxygen homeostasis may be more sensitive to the untoward effects
                       of dioxin.


                       Developmental Stages Sensitive to TCDD Toxicity
                       The lethal potency of TCDD is affected by the developmental stage at which exposure occurs (egg, sac
                       fry, swim-up fry, or juvenile). In rainbow trout it has been clearly demonstrated that TCDD is most
                       potent in causing early-life-stage mortality if administered immediately after egg fertilization. When
                       TCDD is administered later in development, at the eye-up stage, at hatching, at the fry stage, or during
                       juvenile development, it is progressively less potent in causing mortality. More specifically, the LD  in
                                                                                                   50
                       rainbow trout exposed to TCDD as fertilized eggs (230 to 488 pg TCDD per g egg) is less than for
                       TCDD exposure of swim-up fry (21 days post-hatch), where whole-body concentrations of 990 pg TCDD
                       per g body result in 45% mortality (Mehrle et al., 1988; Walker et al., 1991). Even higher whole body
                       concentrations (>5000 pg TCDD per g body) are required to produce mortality in juvenile rainbow trout
                       (Spitsbergen et al., 1988). Thus, the developmental stage of trout, at the time of TCDD exposure, is an
                       important factor in determining susceptibility to mortality with the sac fry stages being the most sensitive.

                       Route of TCDD Egg Exposure and Sensitivity to Toxicity

                       No significant difference was observed in the potency of TCDD to cause lake trout sac fry mortality
                       when exposure of eggs to TCDD occurred via maternal transfer, waterborne exposure, or egg injection
                       (Walker et al., 1994). The no-observable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL), lowest-observable-adverse-effect
                       level (LOAEL), LD , and LD  of TCDD were in the same range for all routes of TCDD exposure to
                                      50
                                              100
                       lake trout eggs (Walker et al., 1994); thus, it was the egg dose of TCDD that determined toxicity, as
                       opposed to the route of exposure. Dietary exposure of adult female brook trout and zebrafish to sublethal
                       concentrations of TCDD has also been shown to cause toxicity in their embryos (Johnson et al., 1996;
                       Wannemacher et al., 1992). In brook trout, the concentration of TCDD in eggs that resulted in dose-
                       related increases in sac fry mortality was also similar following waterborne exposure and maternal
                       transfer (Johnson et al., 1998; Walker and Peterson, 1994b).
   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869