Page 191 - The Welfare of Cattle

168 the WeLfare of CattLe

53. Stock ML, Barth LA, Van Engen NK, et al. Impact of carprofen administration on stress and nociception
responses of calves to cautery dehorning. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:542–555.
54. Heinrich A, Duffield TF, Lissemore KD, et al. The impact of meloxicam on postsurgical stress associated
with cautery dehorning. J Anim Sci 2009;92:540–547.
55. Coetzee JF, Mosher RA, KuKanich B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and effect of intravenous meloxicam
in weaned Holstein calves following scoop dehorning without local anesthesia. BMC Vet Res 2012;
8:153.
56. Glynn HD, Coetzee JF, Edwards-Callaway LN, et al. The pharmacokinetics and effects of meloxicam,
gabapentin, and flunixin in postweaning dairy calves following dehorning with local anesthesia. J Vet
Pharmacol Ther 2013; 36:550–561.
57. Allen KA, Coetzee JF, Edwards-Callaway LN, et al. The effect of timing of oral meloxicam adminis-
tration on physiological responses in calves after cautery dehorning with local anesthesia. J Dairy Sci
2013; 96:5194–5205.
58. Stock ML, Millman ST, Barth LA, et al. The effects of firocoxib on cautery disbudding pain and stress
responses in preweaned dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:6058–6069.
59. Lay D, Friend T, Bowers C, et al. A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and
hot-iron branding using dairy cows. J Anim Sci 1992; 70:1121–1125.
60. Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Stookey J, Passillé AD, Rushen J. Comparison of hot-iron and freeze brand-
ing on cortisol levels and pain sensitivity in beef cattle. Can J Anim Sci 1997; 77:369–374.
61. Tucker CB, Mintline EM, Banuelos J, et al. Effect of a cooling gel on pain sensitivity and healing of
hot-iron cattle brands. J Anim Sci 2014;92:5666–5673.
62. Tucker CB, Mintline EM, Banuelos J, et al. Pain sensitivity and healing of hot-iron cattle brands. J Anim
Sci 2014; 92:5674–5682.
63. Tucker CB, Fraser D, Weary DM. Tail docking dairy cattle: Effects on cow cleanliness and udder health.
J Dairy Sci 2001; 84:84–87.
64. Schreiner DA, Ruegg PL. Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness. J Dairy Sci 2002;
85(10):2503–2511.
65. Lombard JE, Tucker CB, von Keyserlingk MAG, et al. Associations between cow hygiene, hock injuries,
and free stall usage on US dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93:4668–4676.
66. Weary DM, Schuppli CA, von Keyserlingk MAG. Tail docking dairy cattle: Responses from an online
engagement. J Anim Sci 2011; 89:3831–3837.
67. Kroll LK, Grooms DL, Siegford JM, et al. Effects of tail docking on behavior of confined feedlot cattle.
J Anim Sci 2014; 92:4701–4710.
68. Fajt VR, Wagner SA, Norby B. Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle
among bovine practitioners in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238:755–767.
69. Newby NC, Pearl DL, LeBlanc SJ, et al. The effect of administering ketoprofen on the physiology
and behavior of dairy cows following surgery to correct a left displaced abomasum. J Dairy Sci
2013;96:1511–1520.
70. Cattle and Calves Non-Predator Death Loss in the United States, 2010. USDA-APHIS National Animal
Health Monitoring System. 2011.
71. Dairy 2007: Facility characteristics and cow comfort on U.S. dairy operations, 2007. USDA-APHIS
National Animal Health Monitoring System. 2010.
72. Cook NB. Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and
stall surface. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223:1324–1328.
73. USDA. 2010. Beef 2007–08, Part IV: Reference of Beef Cow-calf Management Practices in the United
States, 2007–08. USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH. Fort Collins, CO #523.0210.
74. Nicholson JDW, Nicholson KL, Frenzel LL, et al. Survey of transportation procedures, management
practices, and health assessment related to quality, quantity, and value for market beef and dairy cows
and bulls. J Anim Sci 2013; 91:5026–5036.
75. Wells SJ, Trent AM, Marsh WE, et al. Prevalence and severity of lameness in lactating dairy cows in a
sample of Minnesota and Wisconsin herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202:78–82.
76. Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, et al. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based
measurements: Direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet Rec 2003; 153:197–202.