Page 70 - Basic Monitoring in Canine and Feline Emergency Patients
P. 70

Basic algorithm for differentiating          to a situation where the AV node is able to conduct
            tachyarrhythmias                             some impulses but blocks others; this results in a
  VetBooks.ir  In  an  emergency  setting,  tachyarrhythmias  are  the   situation where some P waves are conducted nor-
                                                         mally (resulting in P–QRS–T complexes), but other
            most common rhythms to cause hemodynamic com-
            promise and require urgent treatment. The following   P waves are not conducted (see Fig. 3.15). Third-
            algorithm can help to differentiate the four common   degree AV block occurs when the AV node is inca-
            tachycardic rhythms (sinus tachycardia, AF, VT, and   pable of conducting any electrical impulses; all
            SVT) using ECG findings (see Fig. 3.14).     P waves are blocked at the level of the AV node,
                                                         and the patient is sustained by a junctional or ven-
              1.  Is the tachycardia regular (all R–R intervals the   tricular escape rhythm (see Fig. 3.16). Third-degree
            same) or irregular (variation in R–R interval)? As   AV block necessarily involves  AV dissociation
            a rule, tachycardias are perfectly regular EXCEPT   because there is no relationship between P waves
            for AF. Exceptions include polymorphic ventricular   and QRS complexes.
            tachycardia or paroxysmal SVT or VT alternating   There are two potential causes of AV block: (i)
            with sinus rhythm.                           fibrosis or other structural disease of the AV node
              2.  Is QRS complex morphology  ‘normal’? QRS   itself; or (ii) increased vagal tone causing physio-
            complexes in VT are wide and bizarre. In all other   logic delay AV nodal conduction. In general, low-
            tachycardias, the impulse originates above the   grade AV  block (1st degree and low-grade 2nd
            ventricles, so QRS complexes should be identical   degree, where over half of P waves are conducted)
            to  normal  sinus  complexes  (narrow  and  upright   is caused by high vagal tone. In contrast, high-grade
            in lead II, unless there is a concurrent bundle   AV block (3rd degree and high-grade 2nd degree,
            branch block or other intraventricular conduction   where less than half of P waves are conducted) is
            abnormality).                                caused by structural disease of the  AV node.  An
              3.  What is  the morphology and timing  of the  P   atropine response test (administration of atropine
            waves? In ST, P waves of normal morphology occur   subcutaneously, with repeat ECG performed 20–30
            consistently before every QRS complex at a normal   minutes later; see  Table 3.6) can differentiate
            P–R interval. In AF, P waves are absent, and instead   whether a bradyarrhythmia such as  AV block is
            baseline undulation or f waves may occur. In VT,   caused by high vagal tone versus structural disease
            normal P waves may be variably seen, but have no   of the conduction system. A vagally mediated brad-
            consistent relationship to QRS complexes. In SVT,   yarrhythmia will be atropine-responsive, meaning
            atypical P′ waves can occur before, during, or after   that the resulting rhythm will be normal sinus
            the QRS; however, P′ morphology will be consistent   rhythm  or  sinus  tachycardia  at  a  rate  of  140–
            throughout the tachycardia.                  160 bpm with normal P–R intervals and no non-
                                                         conducted P waves. In contrast, AV block caused by
                                                         structural AV nodal disease will be non-atropine-
            Common bradyarrhythmias in small animals     responsive, meaning that administration of atro-
                                                         pine will not change the rate, rhythm, or degree of
            Atrioventricular block
                                                         AV block.
            AV block is not truly a distinct cardiac ‘rhythm,’   Low-grade or atropine-responsive  AV block
            but  instead  describes  ECG  manifestations  of   typically does not require any directed treatment;
            delayed or interrupted AV nodal conduction that   similar to sinus bradycardia, this rhythm is either
            usually occur within the context of an underlying   a manifestation of either increased vagal tone (see
            sinus rhythm. That is, the SA node depolarizes and   Table 3.2) or drug administration (especially seda-
            the impulse is conducted through the atria to cause   tives such as opioids or α2-agonists). In contrast,
            a P wave as usual, but the impulse is either delayed   high-grade  AV block (which is generally non-
            or completely blocked at the level of the AV node.   atropine-  responsive) is  a medical emergency in
                                                  st
            AV block is classically categorized by ‘degrees’ (1 -,   dogs. Dogs with high-grade AV block are at high
            2nd-, and 3rd-degree  AV block).  First-degree AV   risk for their ventricular escape rhythm degenerat-
            block is essentially a sinus rhythm characterized by   ing into ventricular fibrillation, causing sudden
            a prolonged P–R interval; each P wave is still even-  cardiac  death;  permanent  pacemaker  implanta-
            tually conducted through the AV node and results   tion (transvenous or epicardial) is indicated as
            in a QRS complex. Second-degree AV block refers   soon as feasible.


             62                                                                           J.L. Ward
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75