Page 349 - Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values

Misztal, I. and Gianola, D. (1988) Indirect solution of mixed model eqautions. Journal
of Dairy Science 71(Suppl 2), 99–106.
Misztal, I., Aguilar, I., Legarra, A., Tsuruta, S., Johnson, D.L. and Lawlor, T.J. (2010)
A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree and genomic information
for genetic evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress Applied to
Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, Communication no. 0050.
Moore, A.J., Brodie Jr, E.D. and Wolf, J.B. (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the
evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions.
Evolution 51, 1352–1362.
Moser, G., Khatkar, M.S., Hayes, B.J. and Raadsma, H.W. (2010) Accuracy of direct
genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers. Genetics
Selection Evolution 42, 37.
Mrode, R.A. and Swanson, G.J.T. (1995) Comparison of the efficiency of the repeat-
ability model on observed or transformed yields to a multi-variate analysis.
Summaries of Paper, British Society of Animal Science Winter Meeting, March
1995, paper no. 129.
Mrode, R.A. and Swanson, G.J.T. (1999) Simplified equations for evaluations of
bulls in the Interbull international evaluation system. Livestock Production
Science 62, 43–52.
Mrode, R.A. and Swanson, G.J.T. (2004) Calculating cow and daughter yield devia-
tions and partitioning of genetic evaluations under a random regression model.
Livestock Production Science 86, 253–260.
Mrode, R., Coffey, M. and Berry, D.P. (2010) Understanding genomic evaluations
from various evaluation methods and GMACE. Interbull Bulletin 42, 52–55.
Muir, W.M. (1996) Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: Selection
program and direct responses. Poultry Science 75, 447–458.
Muir, W.M. (2005) Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding
programs. Genetics 170, 1247–1259.
Pander, B.L., Hill, W.G. and Thompson, R. (1992) Genetic parameters of test day
records of British Holstein heifers. Animal Production 55, 11–21.
Patterson, H.D. and Thompson, R. (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when
block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58, 545–554.
Phocas, F. and Ducrocq, V. (2006) Discrete vs continuous time survival analysis of
productive life of Charolais cows. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress
Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Communication no. 03-13.
Piles, M., Garreau, H., Rafel, O., Larzul, C., Ramon, J. and Ducrocq, V. (2006)
Survival analysis in two lines of rabbits selected for reproductive traits. Journal of
Animal Science 84, 1658–1665.
Prentice, R.L. and Gloeckler, L.A. (1978) Regression analysis of grouped survival data
with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics 34, 57–67.
Ptak, E. and Schaeffer, L.R. (1993) Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of
dairy sires and cows. Livestock Production Science 34, 23–34.
Quaas, R.L. (1976) Computing the diagonal elements of a large numerator relation-
ship matrix. Biometrics 32, 949–953.
Quaas, R.L. (1984) Linear Prediction in BLUP School Handbook: Use of Mixed
Models for Prediction and Estimation of (Co)variance Components. Animal
Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, NSW, Australia, pp. 1–76.
Quaas, R.L. (1995) Fx Algorithms. An unpublished note.

References 333