Page 779 - Veterinary Toxicology, Basic and Clinical Principles, 3rd Edition
P. 779

738 SECTION | X Avian and Aquatic Toxicology




  VetBooks.ir  Jacobsen, 2009). ZEA, an estrogen mimic, is also present  ACOUSTIC POLLUTION AND FISH
             in runoff waters from wheat and maize fields. The effect
                                                                Sound propagation in water is strongly affected by tem-
             of ZEA in fish can be contradictory depending on species,
             life stage, dose and duration of exposure. Decreased  perature, pressure, and to a lesser extent, by salinity
                                                                (NOAA, 2000). Low frequency sound can be propagated
             spawning frequency and increased plasma vitellogenin is
                                                                long distances in water. Fish use sound sensors for many
             observed in zebra fish. ZEA alters iron metabolism and
                                                                interactions with their ambient environment and interac-
             clotting time in rainbow trout. ZEA alters in vitro immune
                                                                tions with each other (NAS, 2016). Pressure sensors are
             functions of leukocytes harvested from the head and trunk
                                                                also important for locomotion in the aquatic environment.
             kidney of fish fed low dietary levels (332 μg/kg of feed)
                                                                Noise pollution can mask or shift hearing thresholds,
             by upregulation and downregulates these functions at
                                                                damage auditory organs and cause adverse stress
             higher doses ($0.621 μg/kg of feed). Oxygen consump-
                                                                responses (Peng et al., 2015). Exposure of fish to noise
             tion is increased in carp exposed to dietary levels
                                                                during embryo and larval stages can cause decreased sur-
             ($0.621 μg/kg of feed for 4 weeks).
                                                                vival (Brown et al., 2016). Reduction in ability to monitor
                                                                the aquatic environment is a plausible explanation.
             Aflatoxins
                                                                CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE
             Fish feeds can be contaminated with AFs. (see      DIRECTIONS
             Chapter 69: Aflatoxins). AFB 1 is activated by the CYP
             enzymes in fish and important detoxification pathways  Fish are being concentrated for aquaculture, breeding, dis-
             in  fish  are  the  uridine  diphosphate  glucuronyl-  play, and similar human-directed activities. The culture of
             transferase and, to a lesser extent, glutathione S-  an increasingly wide range of aquatic organisms for food
             transferase pathway. Rainbow trout are one of the most  is accelerating worldwide. Fish offal and oil are an impor-
             sensitive species to the carcinogenic effects of aflatox-  tant raw material for animal feeds and can be source-
             ins and carp are a relatively resistant species. Aflatoxins  persistent organic chemicals that are bioconcentrated in
             also  cause  hepatocellular  necrosis  and  fibrosis.  body fat. Increasing artificiality of the aquatic environ-
             Differences in biotransformation of AFs likely explain  ment also increases the monitoring required to maintain
             the differences in species sensitivity. AFs are rapidly  water safety. The safety of input water and feeds is impor-
             excreted and are not known to be biomagnified in edible  tant in maintaining the health of aquatic organisms being
             fish tissues. Aflatoxicol and AFM 1 are the primary  cultured and the safety of foods and byproducts being
             metabolites of fish that are excreted into water. Dietary  produced. Multiple competing uses of water resources
             ascorbic acid is protective against AFs. Aflatoxins target  provide an ongoing challenge to aquaculture. Securing
             both the innate and adaptive immune functions. There is  rights for incoming water supplies is becoming increasingly
             some evidence that immune memory is decreased by   competitive as are increasing requirements to return the out-
             exposure to AFs. Hematocrit may be reduced in fish  flow water to the environment in acceptable condition. Food
             exposed to dietary AFs and hepatic enzymes in serum  and feed safety are increasing issues that requires coopera-
             are also increased.                                tion among all the industries involved with aquaculture. An
                                                                additional future research need is for rapid and accurate
                                                                diagnostics in diseases caused by chemical and physical
                                                                agents.
             CONTAMINANTS IN AQUACULTURE FISH
             Aquaculture animals are an important dietary source of  REFERENCES
             environmentally persistent organic chemicals. These per-
             sistent chemicals are biomagnified in fish and animals  Aggergaard, S., Jensen, F.B., 2001. Cardiovascular changes and physio-
             consuming these products. including offal incorporated  logical response during nitrite exposure in rainbow trout. J. Fish
             into pet foods. These compounds are also transferred to  Biol. 59, 13 27.
             the human fetus during pregnancy and excreted in breast  Benli, A.C., Koksal, G., Ozkul, A., 2008. Sublethal ammonia exposure
                                                                  of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.): effects on gill, liver and
             milk during lactation. The most sensitive life stage,
                                                                  kidney histology. Chemosphere. 72, 1355 1358.
             including humans, for adverse effects is the prenatal and
                                                                Berntssen, M.H.G., Hylland, K., Julshamn, K., et al., 2004. Maximum
             early postnatal period. Endocrine disruption and epige-
                                                                  limits of organic and inorganic mercury in fish feed. Aquacul. Nutr.
             netic effects have been observed depending of the specific
                                                                  10, 83 97.
             chemical and animal species. Dietary animal protein, fat,  Brown, A.D., Sisneros, J.A., Jurasin, T., et al., 2016. Effects of hatchery
             and clays are the predominant source of POCs for cul-  rearing on the structure and function of salmonid mechanosensory
             tured fish.                                          systems. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 875, 117 124.
   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784