Page 27 - Veterinary diagnostic imaging birds exotic pets wildlife
P. 27

CHAPTER 1  III  Avian Radiography and Radiographic Diagnosis  23


























                                                                   A






                    Figure 1-18 • A, A Halloween bat hangs in the
                    front window of a home, as seen from the front
                    steps. B, Viewed directly from the living room
                    of the home, the details of the bat become
                    clear, although the blinds, control rod, and a
                    Christmas star are overlying it. C and D,
                    However, when the shadow of the bat, which
                    is projected on the wall above the couch, is
                    examined, it appears quite differently. This is
                    because the bat, along with the other objects in
                    the window, is being projected on a surface that
                    is approximately 6 feet away and oriented at
                    right angles to the incoming sunlight. E,
                    Examine the bat again, as it appeared in the
                    window and subsequently as it appeared as
                    a shadow on the wall. The phenomena of

                    magnification, geometric distortion, and blur are
                    all relevant potential sources of misdiagnosis
                    when analyzing avian radiographs.      B
                                                Continued










                    III IMAGE ASSESSMENT:                                of the x-ray beam, that is, the part of the beam that lies
                         A SHADOWY BUSINESS                              most perpendicular to the wing. Because of beam
                                                                         divergence in the outer thirds of the wing, some
                                                                         anatomical distortion is inevitable, which often con-
                    Imaging birds, and in particular their extended wings,   veys the impression of a blurred image, similar to
                    often results in less than accurate imagery. For example,   magnifi cation.

                    it is often impossible to position the wing flush on the   These fi lm fl aws must be recognized for what they
                    face of the cassette, which results in variable object-  are, differentiated from genuine disease-based altera-
                    film distances. This in turn leads to some portions of   tions, and factored out of the analytical process before


                    the wing magnified as a result of being farther from   reaching any meaningful diagnostic conclusion. Figure
                    the fi lm, thus they appear less distinct, even blurred.  1-18 illustrates some of the important diagnostic con-
                       Another difficulty lies in the fact that only the central   siderations detailed previously, including magnifi ca-

                    third of the wing lies beneath the most functional part   tion, geometric distortion, blur, and summation.









                                                                                                                      2/11/2008   10:50:54 AM
           ch001-A02527.indd   23
           ch001-A02527.indd   23                                                                                     2/11/2008   10:50:54 AM
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32