Page 671 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 671

CHAPTER 30  Tumors of the Urinary System  649


           obstruction in a palliative setting or to maintain urine flow while   Radiation Therapy
           other therapies are instituted. 35–37  Complications can include   Although iUC cells are generally thought to be sensitive to radia-
                                                                 tion therapy (RT), an in vitro study of three canine iUC cell lines
           urine leakage and tumor seeding, infection, tube displacement,
  VetBooks.ir  and tube damage if the dog is allowed to chew on the tube.   revealed a low α/β ratio, suggesting moderate radioresistance and
                                                                 supporting treatment protocols using higher doses and less frac-
                                                                        46
           Urethral and Ureteral Stent Placement and Laser Ablation  tionation.  The early use of large doses and less fractionation,
           In recent years, the use of interventional radiology approaches has   however, was associated with chronic colitis, cystitis, and urethral
           gained favor over tube cystostomy and other surgical procedures   strictures, and little improvement in MST compared with medical
           for palliative management of obstruction secondary to iUC. 30,38–41     therapy alone. 47,48
           Most urethral stents and some ureteral stents can be placed with   With new advanced image-guided targeting technology and
           minimally invasive approaches, and stents do not require pet own-  increasing availability of RT, there is renewed interest in RT to treat
           ers to manipulate a urine collection system. Survival after urethral   iUC. 49–53  A retrospective report of intensity-modulated and image-
           and ureteral stent placement is variable and largely dependent on   guided radiation therapy revealed lower complication rates com-
                                                                                            49
           the extent of tumor lesions. In three reports, MSTs have ranged   pared with earlier studies in the dog.  In a series of 21 dogs, acute
           from 20 to 78 days (range, 2–536 days) after urethral stent place-  side effects were mild and self-limiting and included colitis (38%),
           ment for iUC or prostatic adenocarcinoma. 39–41  After urethral   erythema or hyperpigmentation (19%), and stranguria (5%).
                                                                                                                  49
           stent placement, lower urinary tract signs, including stranguria,   Late complications included urethral stricture (9%), ureteral stric-
           can persist. Incontinence has been reported in 25% to 39% of   ture (5%), or rectal stricture (5%). The median event-free survival
                                                                                                     49
           dogs. 39–41  Urethral stents are typically placed using fluoroscopic   was 317 days and the overall MST was 654 days.  In a report of 13
           guidance, but the use of digital radiography to guide stent place-  dogs with urogenital carcinomas treated with a low dose palliative
           ment has also been reported.  Ureteral stents can be placed sur-  RT (10 daily fractions of 2.7 Gy with CT planning) plus antineo-
                                 42
           gically, and in some cases, nonsurgically in dogs with iUC. The   plastic drugs, acute side effects were mild including colitis, cystitis,
                                                                                                                  50
           MST after ureteral stent placement was 57 days (range, 7–337   vaginitis, and dermatitis, and no late complications were noted.
                          43
           days) in one study.  Nephrectomy can be considered for severe   Complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) was reported in
           unilateral hydronephrosis if persistent renal pain or infection is   61% of dogs and stable disease (SD) in 38% of dogs.  
                                                                                                        50
           present.
             Transurethral carbon dioxide (CO ) and near-infrared diode   Medical Therapy
                                        2
           laser ablation of iUC (performed in combination with cytotoxic   Systemic Medical Therapy
           chemotherapy and COX inhibitors) has been reported, with its   Systemic medical therapy is the mainstay of  iUC treatment in dogs,
           main application being in dogs with discrete tumor masses caus-  and usually consists of chemotherapy, COX inhibitors (nonselective
           ing urinary tract obstruction. 44,45  Complications include perfo-  and COX-2 selective inhibitors), and combinations thereof (Table
           ration with iUC spread, transient postprocedural worsening of   30.2). 1–3,27,54–62  Although medical therapy is not usually curative,
           stranguria and hematuria, urethral stenosis, and infection. 44,45  In   several different drugs lead to remission or SD of iUC, and most
           a small series, the outcome of dogs treated with laser ablation and   therapies are well tolerated. Resistance to one drug does not imply
                                                        44
           medical therapy was not better than medical therapy alone.    resistance to other drugs. Some of the best results are seen in dogs


            TABLE 30.2     Study Results Reported for the Medical Therapy of Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma (iUC) in Dogs
                                Number of Dogs:   N 1  or N 2 /M 1 /Any                          Median Survival
                                Total/Evaluable for   Metastasis, (% of                          From Start of
             Drug(s)            Tumor Response  Total Dogs)    CR (%) PR (%)  SD (%)  PD (%)  PFI (d)  That Drug(s)  Refs.

             Randomized Trials
                           2 a
             Vinblastine (2.5 mg/m )  27/26    4/7/11          0     22     70     4      143    531 b       59
                           2
             Vinblastine (2.5 mg/m )/  24/24   0/4/4           0     58     33     8      199    299         59
               piroxicam a
                         2 a
             Cisplatin (60 mg/m )  8/8         12/12/12        0     0      50     50     84     300 c       1–3
             Cisplatin (60 mg/m )/  14/14      28/14/43        14    57     28     0      124    246         1–3
                         2
               piroxicam a,d
             Cisplatin (60 mg/m )  15 /14      20 /20 /33      0     13     53     27     87     338 e       62
                         2 a
             Firocoxib (5 mg/kg) a  15/12      33/27/53        0     20     33     27     105    152         62
                         2
             Cisplatin (60 mg/m /firo-  14/11  21/14/29        0     57     21     0      186    179         62
               coxib (5 mg/kg) a
             Mitoxantrone/piroxicam f  26/NA   8/NA/8          0     8      69     23     106    247         56
             Carobplatin/piroxicam f  24/NA    29/NA/29        0     13     54     33     73     263         56
                                                                                                            Continued
   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676