Page 951 - Veterinary Immunology, 10th Edition
P. 951

of dendritic cells. The salivary protein sialostatin-L2 inhibits
  VetBooks.ir  inflammasome activation. Tick saliva also inhibits the migration of

               dendritic cells from inflamed skin to draining lymph nodes and
               decreases the ability of these dendritic cells to present antigen to T

               cells. Furthermore, the treated dendritic cells preferentially
               stimulate Th2 responses. All these effects serve to facilitate the
               prolonged attachment and feeding of ticks.
                  Because tick salivary proteins are antigenic, they would be

               expected to induce immune responses that impair a tick's ability to
               feed. Ticks, however, have evolved immunosuppressive and
               antiinflammatory countermeasures that permit them to feed more
               effectively. Tick saliva impairs macrophage function and

               suppresses T cell responses to mitogens, as well as production of
               IL-1β and the Th1 cytokines IFN-γ and IL-2. It suppresses NK cell
               activity and macrophage nitric oxide production. Saliva from the
               ticks Dermacentor andersoni and I. ricinus increases production of the

               Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-10. A tick saliva immunosuppressor
               binds specifically to T cell CD4 and blocks antigen-induced
               signaling and T cell responses. Saliva from I. ricinus also inhibits
               host B cell proliferation. Additionally, a serpin from I. ricinus

               interferes with the IL-6 pathway and consequently inhibits Th17
               cell differentiation. A salivary protein from I. scapularis inhibits the
               proliferation of B cells exposed to the Osp proteins from the Lyme
               disease bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi but has no effect on T cells. It

               is abundantly clear that ticks have evolved many mechanisms to
               prevent immunological attack while they are feeding.
                  Thus tick saliva contains components that suppress pain and itch,
               hemostasis, inflammation, adaptive immunity, and wound healing.

               Nevertheless, it has been observed that ticks on nonimmune
               animals are larger than those on immune animals. Although the
               nature of this resistance is unclear, it has been suggested that local
               hypersensitivity reactions to tick saliva may restrict the blood flow

               to the tick, reduce its food supply, and stunt its growth. It is
               possible to immunize guinea pigs with tick homogenates and show
               that ticks feeding on these animals have reduced fecundity.
               Although vaccination against salivary antigens is unlikely to be
               very effective in conferring effective immunity against blood

               feeding arthropods, there is an alternative approach. Since many of





                                                         951
   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956