Page 102 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 102

74  Box A2   ­o  ouu ear  hat  u earr?  earinng anduSound inuAnimals

  VetBooks.ir   100        Threshold of hearing audiogram comparisons


                 80
             Threshold of hearing (dB)  (re: 20 micro-Pa)  60



                 40

                 20

                  0

                –20
                   16  32  63  125  250  500  1000  2000  4000  8000  16000  32000  64000 128000
                                   Octave band freuency (Hz)
                       Cat (Felis catus)  Elephant  Horse     House Finch
                       Human          Mice       Yellow Baboon
            Figure A2.1  An Illustration of several audiograms for different mammal species, illustrating their hearing threshold
            (dB) and frequency (Hz). Source: created by Erik Miller‐Klein based on information available in Fay (1988).

            described as speech intelligibility for human   patrons, or nearby roadways. These potential
            communication. This is the evaluation of the   noisy distractions coupled with the mobile
            sound level of the human’s voice (signal)   pinna of most animals can make communi-
            compared to the background noise level in   cation more challenging for the trainer and
            the training environment (noise); defined as   difficult for the animal.
            the signal‐to‐noise ratio. Research in class-  Most healthy adult humans, which  is
            room environments has found that the mini-  assumed to be the pool of zoo professionals,
            mum signal‐to‐noise ratio must be 15 dB   have trained their brains to be acutely aware
            which means the sound from the zoo profes-  of  human  speech  patterns and  effective  at
            sional’s voice must be at least 15 dB louder   filtering out distracting noises. But most
            than the other potentially distracting noises   animals, much like juvenile humans, are still
            in the animal’s environment (Klatte et  al.   learning the patterns of human speech and
            2010). The average human speaks at a sound   will have a much more difficult time under-
            level of 65 dB at 1 m, and sound decays about   standing instructions when there is compet-
            3 dB per doubling of distance within an   ing noise and stimuli. Consider evaluating
            enclosed space and about 6 dB per doubling   where you communicate with your animals,
            of distance in an outdoor space. Based on   and/or  train them,  with respect to  noise
            these average levels in an indoor environ-  through the following simple experiment:
            ment the zoo professional must be less than   get two zoo professionals to stand the dis-
            5 m from the animal for a space that is quiet   tance expected for training exercises and
            enough to hear your shoes land as you walk   have one zoo professional wear a blindfold,
            on a dry concrete floor, which would be a   and have the other read a paragraph of a
            background noise level of about 40 dB(A).   newspaper or magazine. Could the blind-
            Whereas with that  same  vocal  level the   folded zoo professional clearly understand
            trainer would need to be no more than 3 m   all of the words? Were there noises or
            from the animal in an outdoor training   sounds that were distracting? Consider
              environment assuming there is no addi-  evaluating your facilities through the ears of
            tional background noise from air traffic, zoo   your animals.
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107