Page 208 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training

180 9 Us and Them: Human–Animal Interactions as Learning Events

VetBooks.ir Morris, D. (1964). The response of animals to a calves towards humans; test‐retest and
inter‐observer reliability and effect of
restricted environment. Symposium of the
Zoological Society of London 13: 99–118.
Behaviour Science 94: 237–243.
Morris, D. and Morris, R. (1966). Men and familiarity of test person. Applied Animal
Apes. London: Hutchinson. Rybarczyk, P., Koba, Y., Rushen, J. et al. (2001).
Munksgaard, L., de Passillé, A.M., Rushen, J. Can cows discriminate people by their
et al. (1997). Discrimination of people by faces? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74:
dairy cows based on handling. Journal of 175–189.
Dairy Science 80: 1106–1112. Schäfer, F. (2014). To see or not to see:
Nimon, A.J. and Dalziel, F.R. (1992). Cross‐ animal‐visibility in Apenheul Primate Park.
species interaction and communication: a International Zoo News 61: 5–20.
study method applied to captive siamang Sha, J.C.M., Kabilan, B., Alagappasamy, S., and
(Hylobates syndactylus) and long‐billed Guha, B. (2013). Benefits of naturalistic
corella (Cacatua tenuirostris) contacts with freeranging primate displays and
humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science implications for increased human‐primate
33: 261–272. interactions. Anthrozoös 26: 13–26.
O’Donovan, D., Hindle, J.E., McKeown, S., and Sherwen, S.L., Magrath, S.J.L., Butler, K.L.
O’Donovan, S. (1993). Effect of visitors on et al. (2014). A multi‐enclosure study
the behaviour of female cheetahs Acinonyx investigating the behavioural response of
jubatus. International Zoo Yearbook 32: meerkats to zoo visitors. Applied Animal
238–244. Behaviour Science 156: 70–77.
Osvath, M. (2009). Spontaneous planning for Shutt, K., Heistermann, M., Kasim, A. et al.
future stone throwing by a male (2014). Effects of habituation, research and
chimpanzee. Current Biology 19 (5): ecotourism on faecal glucocorticoid
R190–R191. metabolites in wild western lowland gorillas:
Parker, E.N., Bramley, L., Scott, L. et al. (2018). implications for conservation management.
An exploration into the efficacy of public Biological Conservation 172: 72–79.
warning signs: a zoo case study. PLoS One Sinnot, J.M., Speaker, H.A., Powell, L.A., and
13 (11): e0207246. https://doi.org/10.1371/ Mosteller, K.W. (2012). Perception of scary
journal.pone.0207246. Halloween masks by zoo animals and
Phillips, M., Grandin, T., Graffam, W. et al. humans. International Journal of
(1998). Crate conditioning of bongo Comparative Psychology 25: 83–96.
(Tragelaphus eurycerus) for veterinary and Snyder, R.L. (1975). Behavioral stress in captive
husbandry procedures at the Denver animals. In: Research in Zoos and
Zoological Gardens. Zoo Biology 17: 25–32. Aquariums, 41–76. Washington DC:
Quadros, S., Goulart, V.D.L., Passos, L. et al. National Academy of Sciences.
(2014). Zoo visitor effect on mammal Stemmler‐Morath, C. (1968). Ultimate
behaviour: does noise matter? Applied responsibility rests with the keeper. In: The
Animal Behaviour Science 156: 78–84. World of Zoos (ed. R. Kirchshofer), 171–183.
Ross, S.R., Wagner, K.E., Schapiro, S.J. et al. London: Batsford Books.
(2011). Transfer and acclimatization effects Stoinski, T.S., Hoff, M.P., and Maple, T.L.
on the behaviour of two species of African (2002). The effect of structural preferences,
great ape (Pan troglodytes and Gorilla temperature, and social factors on visibility
gorilla gorilla) moved to a novel and in Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla g.
naturalistic zoo environment. International gorilla). Environment & Behavior 34:
Journal of Primatology 32: 99–117. 493–507.
Rousing, T., Ibsen, B., and Sørensen, J.T. Stone, S.M. (2010). Human facial
(2005). A note on: on‐farm testing of the discrimination in horses: can they tell us
behavioural response of group‐housed apart? Animal Cognition 13: 51–61.