Page 245 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 245

217

  VetBooks.ir







             Box B7


               Species‐specific Considerations: Primate Learning
             Betsy Herrelko




             A chimpanzee  (Pan troglodytes) sees a   world of   processes and industry and other
             banana, a  high‐value  piece  of food, high   primate species have not. Detailed texts
             above the ground and out of reach. Jumping     outlining contributions of primate learning
             up to reach the banana does not get the   literature are available from iconic primatol-
             chimpanzee close enough to grab it, nor does   ogists such as Tomasello and Call (1997),
             trying to hit it with a pole. Over time, the   Matsuzawa (2001), Lonsdorf et  al. (2010),
             chimpanzee gathers items around the enclo-  amongst others.
             sure to stack as a way to get closer to the cov-  Learning is a part of everything we do; at
             eted item. After much trial and error, boxes   least it should be if we have opportunities to
             and a stick were combined to be able to reach   experience new things. Mentally stimulating
             the food reward. In Wolfgang Köhler’s (1925)   challenges need to be appropriately challeng-
             study of problem solving and tool use, we see   ing (Meehan and Mench 2007), animals need
             many instances of learning: an animal chang-  to have the tools to solve the problem, be it
             ing its behaviour as a result of an experience.  physical tools (as in the Köhler study) or
               Primates represent the quintessential   mental abilities (e.g. being able to understand
             example of animal learning, this is in large   the rules of a task or what a complicated
             part because we (humans) are primates and   training cue means). We do not want to over-
             are drawn to anthropocentric concepts that   whelm or expect too much of an animal
             appear to be similar to us (e.g. Rees 2001).   when we have not done the groundwork to
             We expect them to be smart because we are   prepare them for the task at hand. An impor-
             smart. There are risks and benefits of attrib-  tant concept in designing opportunities for
             uting  human characteristics to animals   learning success is factoring in animals’ natu-
             (anthropomorphism), but when it comes to   ral history, particularly with respect to their
             the world of cognition and how animals pro-  physical  characteristics,  sensory  abilities,
             cess information, scientists work hard to help   and life history.
             animal abilities shine through.
               An area of cognition that is regularly
             debated is the concept of building upon   Physical Characteristics
             information learned by those who came    How an animal physically functions in the
             before them, the ‘ratchet effect’ (Tomasello   world is key to understanding the way they
             1999). Also discussed as cumulative trans-  learn. Failed learning may be the result of not
             mission, it is presumed to be the reason why   ensuring the animal has the ‘tools’ to solve
             humans have developed such a complex     the problem or because we are simply not



             Zoo Animal Learning and Training, First Edition. Edited by Vicky A. Melfi, Nicole R. Dorey, and Samantha J. Ward.
             © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250