Page 1007 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 1007

945


  VetBooks.ir






               101


               Leptospirosis
               Katharine F. Lunn, BVMS, MS, PhD, MRCVS, DACVIM (SAIM)

               College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State, Raleigh, NC, USA



                 Etiology/Pathophysiology                           Epidemiology

               Leptospirosis is a zoonotic bacterial disease affecting the   Pathogenic leptospires are maintained in the environment
               health of animals and humans throughout the world. In   through the shedding of organisms in the urine of a wide
               small animals, clinical leptospirosis is a significant problem   variety of endemically infected mammalian reservoir
               in dogs, but the role of leptospires in feline disease is still   hosts. These reservoir hosts usually do not develop clinical
               poorly understood. Leptospiral organisms are typically   disease, but serve as a source infection for incidental hosts,
               divided into serovars, based on antibody responses to sur-  such as dogs and humans. In some locations, there appears
               face proteins. Serovars are further classified into antigeni-  to be an increased incidence of leptospirosis in late sum-
               cally related serogroups. Canine leptospirosis is caused by   mer and fall, perhaps associated with weather conditions
               several serovars of the pathogenic species  Leptospira   and wildlife behavior. Leptospires survive, but do not repli-
               interrogans  sensu  latu.  Examples  of  serovars  that  have   cate,  in  warm  and  wet  environments,  whereas  freezing,
               been implicated in canine disease include Grippotyphosa   ultraviolet radiation, and dehydration all reduce survival.
               (serogroup Grippotyphosa), Pomona (serogroup Pomona),   Transmission to incidental hosts is usually indirect, through
               and Bratislava (serogroup Australis).              exposure  to  contaminated  water,  soil,  food  or  bedding,
                 Leptospiral organisms enter the host through intact   although direct contact through ingestion, bite wounds, or
               mucosal surfaces or damaged skin. During the first week of   direct contact with urine is possible.
               infection, organisms multiply and spread throughout the   Reservoir hosts that likely contribute to environmental
               vascular space, leading to vascular damage and invasion of   contamination include the raccoon, opossum, fox, skunk,
               many organs and tissues. During this initial leptospiremic   mouse, rat, vole, squirrel, and deer. Clinicians should note
               phase, organisms can be isolated from the blood. The   that many of these reservoirs co‐exist with humans in
               immune phase of infection begins in the second week, with   urban, suburban, and periurban environments, thus lep-
               the appearance of serum antibodies. This leads to clearing   tospirosis is not confined to large‐breed, working, pre-
               of leptospires from the blood and many organs; however,   dominantly outdoor dogs or rural dogs. Many clinicians
               organisms may be protected from the systemic antibody   routinely diagnose leptospirosis in small‐breed indoor
               response in sites such as the renal tubules and the eye.   dogs. Indeed, two different recent studies have demon-
               Leptospiruria develops in the second week after infection   strated that dogs in some urban areas are at increased risk
               and can persist for days to months, depending on the spe-  for leptospirosis, and that small dogs (<15 lb) were more
               cies of the mammalian host and the infecting serovar.  likely to be diagnosed with the disease. Case reports and
                 Pathologic changes associated with leptospirosis   serologic surveys have demonstrated both clinical lepto-
               include vasculitis and endothelial cell damage. The pre-  spirosis and subclinical exposure to the organisms in dogs
               cise mechanisms by which leptospires cause tissue dam-  from many locations in the US and Canada, and it is likely
               age  and disease are  not  well  understood,  but  several   that only desert regions are truly free of the disease.
               toxins and enzymes produced by the organisms likely   Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine which serovars
               contribute to disease pathogenesis. The pathogenicity of   predominate in different geographic regions, as diagnosis
               leptospires may also be related to their motility and their   is usually based on antibody titers, and these cannot iden-
               ability to adhere to, and penetrate, cells.        tify the infecting serovar. Further studies are needed to

               Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine Volume II, First Edition. Edited by David S. Bruyette.
               © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
               Companion website: www.wiley.com/go/bruyette/clinical
   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012