Page 232 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 232

anIMaL Care Issues In beef CattLe feedLots                                  209


            roughage diets? Is the increase in respiratory disease the result of a loss in hybrid vigor in the beef
            cow herd as our efforts to increase marbling score and quality grade have concentrated Angus
            genetics throughout the commercial beef cow industry?
               Expression of normal behavior. The feedlot industry’s track record concerning this freedom
            is strong. Most feedlot pens provide sufficient space and plenty of pen mates to interact with.
            Reproductive behavior is controlled. This helps reduce pen injuries and calving problems due to
            unwanted pregnancies.
               Fear and distress. Cattle in modern feedlots that have adopted low stress cattle-handling proce-
            dures are largely free from fear and distress. Unfortunately, there remain a few individuals who treat
            cattle harshly in the industry. These individuals need to be retrained or removed from positions of
            handling cattle. It is unlikely that all cattle will be free from fear and stress all of the time. Cattle-
            handling specialists have developed an audit system and industry standards to measure improve-
            ments in this area. Full adoption of these standards and audits by the industry is desirable.


                                             CONCLUSION

               Overall the feedlot industry does a decent job caring for cattle. There has been considerable prog-
            ress made relative to the five freedoms. However, there are some areas for concern in the industry.
            A reduction in production diseases such as acidosis and liver abscesses through non- pharmaceutical
            means is needed. In addition, a better understanding of how cattle comfort is impacted by envi-
            ronmental stress and manipulations of the environment are warranted in order to design objective
            indicators of comfort to allow the industry to improve cattle housing.


                                             reFereNCeS

            Bowling, G. A. 1942. The introduction of cattle into colonial North America. J. Dairy Sci. 25:129–154.
            Conklin, T. 2014. An animal welfare history lesson on the Five Freedoms. Michigan State University
                Extension, East Lansing, MI, accessed September 29, 2017.  http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/
                an_animal_welfare_history_lesson_on_the_five_freedoms.
            Matsushima, J. K., and W. D. Farr. 1995. A journey back: a history of cattle feeding in Colorado and the
                United States. Colorado Springs, CO: Cattlemen’s Communications.
            Rollin, B. E. 2004. Annual meeting keynote address: animal agriculture and emerging social ethics for ani-
                mals. J. Anim. Sci. 82:955–964.
            US Dep. Agric. Econ. Res. Serv.  2017.  Feed grains custom query.  Washington, DC:  US Department of
                Agriculture National Economic Research Service, accessed September 28, 2017. https://data.ers.usda.
                gov/FEED-GRAINS-custom-query.aspx.
            Wagner, J. J., S. L. Archibeque, and D. M. Feuz. 2014. The modern feedlot for finishing cattle. Annu. Rev.
                Anim. Biosci. 2:535–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513–114239.
            Whitaker, J. W. 1975. Feedlot empire: beef cattle feeding in Illinois and Iowa, 1840–1900. Ames, IA: Iowa
                State University Press.
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237