Page 278 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 278

ethICaL IMPeratIVe of TELOS                                                 255


            and open or dry lots with or without shed or barn access (7.3%; USDA, 2016a). In general, pasture
            access falls as herd size increases. What this means in practice is that the majority of both lactating
            and dry cows do not receive regular pasture access in the United States.

            Dairy Cattle housing Definitions
            dry lot                    open dirt lot with no vegetative cover used for housing cows in arid
                                        climates; common in California and american southwest.
            freestall                  housing consisting of resting cubicles or “beds” in which dairy cows are
                                        free to enter and leave at will.
            Pasture                    area with vegetation suitable for grazing.
            stanchion                  housing in which a cow is restrained to a particular stall in a device with
                                        two rails that close around the cow’s neck after she enters the stall.
                                        Cows are not able to enter and leave the stalls at will.
            tie stall                  housing in which a cow is restrained to a particular stall by a neck collar
                                        attached to the stall by a chain. Cows are not able to enter and leave the
                                        stalls at will.
            Source:  reproduced from usda (2016a).

               Of course, from a scientific perspective, high animal welfare can be achieved in housing
              systems that do not provide access to the outdoors, and it is not the intent of this chapter to  suggest
            otherwise. However, the lack of outdoor and pasture access for the majority of US dairy cattle
            may lead to  ethical concerns over cattle being able to fulfill their telos among large portions of the
              public; it may also pose some welfare challenges if cattle are denied the opportunity to engage in
            motivated behaviors. As summarized by Charlton and Rutter (2017), “for cattle, pasture is a  natural
            environment, allowing them to express normal behaviors. It can provide ample  comfortable lying
            space, allowing cows to lie in stretched positions…” To reflect on the natural ethogram of the
            cow is to acknowledge that, left to her own devices, a cow would opt to spend most of her day
            engaging in grazing and ruminating behaviors (Hall, 2002). Cattle housed on pasture spend their
            time engaged in up to 40 different categories of behavior (see Kilgour, 2012 for the ethogram of
              behaviors  exhibited by cattle on pasture). Of these ~40 behaviors, a substantial number, includ-
            ing grazing (the most frequently-expressed behavior, at anywhere between 8 and 12 hours of the
            24-hour cycle), are much more  easily expressed in an open or grassy environment than they can be
            in most indoor types of housing.
               Providing cattle with the opportunity to access pasture also appears to provide a number of
            health benefits. Decades of research indicate that pasture access can positively impact cow health,
            for example, through reduction of lameness (Leaver, 1988; Smits et al., 1992; Gitau et al., 1996;
            Hernandez-Mendo et al., 2007) and mastitis (see Charlton and Rutter [2017] for a brief review). While
            some studies suggest that pasture housing may come with a production cost (Fontaneli et al., 2005;
            Hernandez-Mendo et al., 2007), others have demonstrated that it is possible to graze cattle on
              pasture with minimal to no production losses (e.g., in feed intake and milk yield, Chapinal et al.,
            2010; Motupalli et al., 2014).
               Looking to some of the research techniques used in animal welfare science may help further
            resolve sticky questions about telos and dairy farming by providing more information about the
            cow’s basic behavioral needs. For example, preference and motivation tests help scientists under-
            stand the relative importance of different resources and environments to the cow, by quite literally
            allowing her to vote with her feet. Cattle appear to be highly motivated (i.e., willing to work) to gain
            access to pasture, but both preference and motivation for pasture depend on a number of factors,
            including the individual, time of day, temperature, and location of feed (Legrand et al., 2009; Falk
            et al., 2012; Charlton et al., 2013; Charlton and Rutter, 2017). For example, when given the choice
            between pasture or indoors, dairy cows tend to spend their time inside the barn (where it is cooler
            and feed is freely available) during the daytime before moving onto pasture at night (at least during
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283