Page 113 - Stakis Consolidated Teaching Note
P. 113

each of the head offices, there was HR and buying, with
                 only the financial issues being dealt with at group HQ.

                 This structure was very expensive, with many functions,

                 duplicated in each of the divisions and to make matters
                 worse there was no share of resources between the

                 divisions, there was a complete lack of synergy. There is

                 also a loss of control from the group head office, as

                 inefficiencies may be concealed within the divisional head
                 office. Weakness.



                 When Andros succeeded Reo, he did not know anything

                 different and continued with a divisional structure, which
                 brought the same lack of synergy, problems and costs as

                 before. This was a result of appointing an internal

                 successor, who has the same train of thought as his
                 mentor. Weakness.



                 Robertson and Michels, changed the organisational

                 structure immediately. The divisional head offices were
                 closed, along with the expensive and exclusive “Atlantic

                 Quay” head office in Glasgow city centre and only the

                 required functional employees move to one office in the

                 more affordable East Kilbride. This brought savings of £2
                 million, but equally important, it brought back immediate

                 control to the group HQ.

                 Strength.
                 Financial management (Cash flow, cost control)



                 Reo as previously stated, built the organisation from

                 nothing and new about cash flow and cost control. If he
                 had not the organisation would have been lost many
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116