Page 113 - Stakis Consolidated Teaching Note
P. 113
each of the head offices, there was HR and buying, with
only the financial issues being dealt with at group HQ.
This structure was very expensive, with many functions,
duplicated in each of the divisions and to make matters
worse there was no share of resources between the
divisions, there was a complete lack of synergy. There is
also a loss of control from the group head office, as
inefficiencies may be concealed within the divisional head
office. Weakness.
When Andros succeeded Reo, he did not know anything
different and continued with a divisional structure, which
brought the same lack of synergy, problems and costs as
before. This was a result of appointing an internal
successor, who has the same train of thought as his
mentor. Weakness.
Robertson and Michels, changed the organisational
structure immediately. The divisional head offices were
closed, along with the expensive and exclusive “Atlantic
Quay” head office in Glasgow city centre and only the
required functional employees move to one office in the
more affordable East Kilbride. This brought savings of £2
million, but equally important, it brought back immediate
control to the group HQ.
Strength.
Financial management (Cash flow, cost control)
Reo as previously stated, built the organisation from
nothing and new about cash flow and cost control. If he
had not the organisation would have been lost many

