Page 17 - Banking Industry analysis (H)
P. 17

Second, GSIBs can’t increase their dividends or stock
                 buybacks without the Federal Reserve’s approval in the


                 annual comprehensive capital analysis and review, or
                 CCAR.


                 Third, GSIBs can’t use as much leverage as their smaller

                 counterparts, which weighs heavily on a GSIB’s

                 profitability.


                 The net result is that GSIBs, ceteris paribus, are no longer

                 able to compete on a level playing field against the likes

                 of U.S. Bancorp and M&T Bank, among others.


                 Nevertheless, U.S. banks recovered from the crisis much

                 faster than European banks. Within days of Lehman’s

                 demise in 2008 the U.S. banks, as well as AIG, the insurer,

                 and other companies were forced to take equity

                 injections from the federal government, whether they

                 needed and wanted them or not. (7)


                 This was TARP, the U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Programme,

                 that earmarked around $700bn for companies in
                 difficulty.


                 However, this figure was later reduced to $475bn, of

                 which only $245bn was injected into the banks. These

                 banks eventually repaid $275bn, having replaced public

                 money with private funding and in 2014 the government

                 sold its remaining shares in a TARP bank. (7)


                 It has been argued that the slowness of the European

                 Banks to recover was a function of European authorities
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22